Does Coefficient of Friction Change with Rougher Surfaces?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the coefficient of friction and surface roughness, particularly in the context of two objects with different widths placed on a rough surface. Participants explore whether the coefficient of friction changes with varying surface characteristics and object dimensions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the coefficient of friction may not depend on the area of contact, as increases in area could lead to a decrease in pressure, potentially balancing out the effects.
  • Others argue that surface roughness does affect the coefficient of friction, positing that rougher surfaces generally have a higher coefficient compared to smoother surfaces.
  • One participant introduces a hypothetical scenario involving grooves on surfaces, suggesting that the arrangement of these grooves could lead to extreme cases of friction, such as an infinite coefficient of friction under certain conditions.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the influence of air resistance on friction, indicating that while the coefficient of friction might theoretically account for surface roughness, practical scenarios could differ.
  • There is a mention that the coefficient of friction is a simplification that may not apply universally, especially in dynamic situations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on whether the coefficient of friction changes with surface roughness. Multiple competing views are presented regarding the role of surface area and roughness in determining frictional forces.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the ideal conditions under which the coefficient of friction is applied are acknowledged, but the limitations of these assumptions in real-world scenarios are not fully resolved.

Blue Scallop
Messages
290
Reaction score
17
Let's say you two objects with weight of 2 kilograms but one is narrower and one wider. They are said to be similar coefficient of friction against a surface.. but what if the surface is rough? Won't the wider object has more friction?

Or still the same?

If still the same.. what if the surfaces of the wider object has more roughness compared to the surface of the narrower surface.. then it is no longer similar? And we can say the coefficient of friction of the rougher surface is more in value?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is just an approximation, Friction is really complex.
For a lot of objects and surfaces, Friction doesn't depend on area. You can maybe justify this by saying the pressure decreases because you increase the area and the area should increase the friction but these two cancel out and you have constant friction that doesn't depend on area

But If you really have a small area this assumption breaks down
Read this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/frict3.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jamison Lahman
Biker said:
It is just an approximation, Friction is really complex.
For a lot of objects and surfaces, Friction doesn't depend on area. You can maybe justify this by saying the pressure decreases because you increase the area and the area should increase the friction but these two cancel out and you have constant friction that doesn't depend on area

But If you really have a small area this assumption breaks down
Read this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/frict3.html

Can't surface roughness affect the friction? I think smooth surface has less friction.. any formula or principles of this?
 
Blue Scallop said:
Can't surface roughness affect the friction? I think smooth surface has less friction.. any formula or principles of this?
Absolutely, I was talking about the effect of area.

Roughness affects friction by changing the friction coefficient. So The more rough it is the higher its coefficient. For example Ice on Ice has a really small friction coefficient. Also, A seemingly smooth surface is not smooth at atomic scales so there are a lot of contributing factors in friction.

Other members will give you more detailed description if you would like
 
Blue Scallop said:
Can't surface roughness affect the friction? I think smooth surface has less friction.. any formula or principles of this?
'Roughness': imagine a pair of surfaces that consist of regular shallow grooves with vertical sides of very slippery substances. The grooves on each side could be arranged to coincide with each other and the faces would be locked, immovably, once the grooves engage. You would have to break the materials for movement to happen. "Coefficient of friction" would be infinite. However, if the grooves all had sloping sides, they would act like tiny 'inclined planes' and the ratio of the lateral force to the normal force could be independent of the actual load. The effective coefficient of friction would just be set by the angle of the slopes. (tan(θ))
 
Blue Scallop said:
Let's say you two objects with weight of 2 kilograms but one is narrower and one wider. They are said to be similar coefficient of friction against a surface.. but what if the surface is rough? Won't the wider object has more friction?
Without delving too deep into the semantics, I believe they would have the same amount of friction (at least with regard to the surface. the friction due to the air may be different, but I'm unsure.) Any loss in energy would more accurately be described by collisions than friction.
It should be noted that the coefficient of friction should theoretically incorporate any 'roughness' of the surface.
 
The Coefficient of Friction is just a convenient term which can be applied where the situation is linear. It can't work everywhere. The equation that we use is obviously only going to apply to an ideal situation. It is even more limited in a dynamic situation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K