Coefficient of static friction calculation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of static friction for a box on a horizontal plane, given its mass and dimensions. Participants are exploring the conditions under which the box tips versus slides, and the forces involved in this scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between applied forces, gravitational forces, and torques at the tipping point. There are attempts to derive the coefficient of static friction using different equations and reasoning about the forces acting on the box.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the correct interpretation of forces and torques, suggesting that the original equations used may not be appropriate. There is acknowledgment of a potential error in the original poster's reasoning, and alternative formulations have been proposed. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a previous equation provided by the original poster's teacher, which may have contributed to confusion. Participants are also considering the implications of testing the coefficient of static friction on an angled surface compared to a horizontal one.

Tepictoc
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have a box on a horizontal plane.
Given data: mass = 0.25kg
height of object = 14 cm
width of object = 9cm
Calculate the coefficient of static friction.


Homework Equations


μs = Ff/N (N is the normalforce)
F = Ff = μ*N
mg = 2.45 Newton

The Attempt at a Solution


I apply an unknown force on the object from the left side at the height of x to see where it starts to tip over instead of slide. Looks like it's at 13 cm. x = 13

The vertical forces:
N cancels out mg since the object is not accelerating up or down, so N=mg.
μk is irrelevant in this case so I'll just write μ when I mean μs.

The horizontal forces:
Ff is acting in the opposite direction of the applied Force
F = Ff = μ*N
L is the length to the middle 4.5cm
mg*L - F*x = 0
I substitute in μ*mg instead where F*x is
mg*L - μ*mg = 0

This is where I think I might be going wrong:
μ = mg*L/mg
μ = L
Which would mean the coefficient of static friction is 4.5 or 0.45 which is too high.
When I angle (at 12 degrees) the same object on the same surface and calculate the μs it became 0.21


If I go this way it's slightly better but probably wrong since one m disappears:
μ = mg*L/g = 0.24
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm..
Remember that the forces that generally generate torques about the tipping point are:
The unknown horizontal force, gravity, and the normal force.
The frictional force act along the ground and generates no torque at all about the tipping point.

The box begins to tip when a) The normal force acts through the tipping point (generating no torque), and there is an equal, but opposite torque from the force F and gravity.

From this relation, you may determine F, and thus the coefficient for maximal static friction.

This equation "mg*L - μ*mg = 0" is dead wrong, your first term is a torque, the other a force

It should read mgL=(mu)*mg*x, that is: (mu)=L/x, roughly 0.35 by my reckoning.
 
arildno said:
Hmm..
Remember that the forces that generally generate torques about the tipping point are:
The unknown horizontal force, gravity, and the normal force.
The frictional force act along the ground and generates no torque at all about the tipping point.

The box begins to tip when a) The normal force acts through the tipping point (generating no torque), and there is an equal, but opposite torque from the force F and gravity.

From this relation, you may determine F, and thus the coefficient for maximal static friction.

This equation "mg*L - μ*mg = 0" is dead wrong, your first term is a torque, the other a force

It should read mgL=(mu)*mg*x, that is: (mu)=L/x, roughly 0.35 by my reckoning.

Thanks a lot, that helps me.
The equation "mg*L - μ*mg = 0" was what my teacher wrote down for me when he was trying to help. First we have
mg*L - F*x = 0
and as mentioned earlier F = Ff = μ*N and N=mg
that's how I got the "dead wrong equation". He was using it to separate μ.
 
It is unfortunate that your teacher made that silly mistake. It is easy to do this sort of thing, and should not be held against him (unless he has a general tendency to mix up forces and torques)

F*x=(mu)mg*x, agreed?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
arildno said:
It is unfortunate that your teacher made that silly mistake. It is easy to do this sort of thing, and should not be held against him (unless he has a general tendency to mix up forces and torques)

F*x=(mu)mg*x, agreed?

Agreed.
I did some testing and I would get the same μs on the angled surface test as in the horizontal test if I applied the force at 14 cm. That is μs = 0.32
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K