Coefficient of static friction experiment

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an experiment to determine the coefficient of static friction using a ramp and a tissue box with varying masses. The original poster questions whether the angle at which the box begins to move is independent of mass, suggesting that mass only matters in the absence of friction.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between mass and the angle of static friction, with some attempting to derive the relationship mathematically. Questions arise about the independence of mass in the context of static friction and the forces acting on the object on the ramp.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to clarify the mathematical relationships involved, with some participants confirming the original poster's understanding that the coefficient of static friction is independent of mass. However, there are also reminders of historical experiments that challenge this assumption, indicating a nuanced exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the Galileo experiment to highlight the independence of mass in certain contexts, suggesting a need to differentiate between concepts of static friction and gravitational effects.

physicshelpppp
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
1. Problem

I am currently doing a home experiment about the coefficient of static friction. I've set up a ramp and am testing at which angle a tissue box begins to movie (with five different masses in it)... Although for every mass I use the angle seems to remain the same. The angle at which an object will start moving is independent of mass right? Mass is important when there is no friction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The angle at which an object will start moving is independent of mass right?

Have you covered the maths at school yet? If you have then try proving it that way.
 
The acceleration is given by a factor of $$ g*(sin(Θ) - μcos(Θ) )$$
yes..it doesn't thepend from mass
 
I have been looking at questions, when I do a worked question...

and the force down (weight force) on the object would be mgsinpheta and the force perpendicular is mgcospheta
which has same magnitude as normal force

so frictional force is = μsN (where is normal force is equal to perpendicular force)

therefore Ffr = μsmgcospheta
the object will start to move when the force down the slope is equal to the maximum friction force

therefore

mgsinpheta = μsmgcospheta

(therefore we can cancel the mg out on both sides)

and then we are left with μs = sinpheta/cospheta therefore μs = tanphetatherefore it is independent of mass?
 
Correct. Nice to see theory and experiment agree.
 
physicshelpppp said:
I have been looking at questions, when I do a worked question...

and the force down (weight force) on the object would be mgsinpheta and the force perpendicular is mgcospheta
which has same magnitude as normal force

so frictional force is = μsN (where is normal force is equal to perpendicular force)

therefore Ffr = μsmgcospheta
the object will start to move when the force down the slope is equal to the maximum friction force

therefore

mgsinpheta = μsmgcospheta

(therefore we can cancel the mg out on both sides)

and then we are left with μs = sinpheta/cospheta therefore μs = tanpheta


therefore it is independent of mass?
it isn't...remember the galileo experiment with gravity :)
 
Domenico94 said:
it isn't...remember the galileo experiment with gravity :)
The galileo experiment shows that the rate of fall of an object is likewise independent of mass. But that is not what is involved in the present static friction problem under investigation.

Chet
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
48
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K