Coefficient of the product of two power series

hholzer
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
If a_0 + (a_1)x + (a_2)x^2 + ...
and
b_0 + (b_1)x + (b_2)x^2 + ...

are two power series and the coefficient
of x^r from their product is a power series:
(a_0)(b_r) + (a_1)(b_(r-1)) + ...

What principle or theorem or definition(s)
are we applying when finding that this is
indeed the coefficient of the x^r term of
the product of two power series?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, you will get that (a_0+a_1x+...)(b_0+b_1x+...)=(\sum_i a_ix^i)(\sum_i b_jx^j)=\sum_{i,j}a_ix^ib_jx^j=\sum_{i,j}a_ib_j x^{i+j} since every term is multiplied with every other term in the other factor. However you want to extract the coefficient in front of x^k, and that is by looking at the expression above obviously \sum_{i+j=k}a_ib_j=\sum_{i=0}^ka_ib_{k-i}=a_0b_k+a_1b_{k-1}+...+a_kb_0
 
Last edited:
hi hholzer! :wink:
hholzer said:
What principle or theorem or definition(s)
are we applying when finding that this is
indeed the coefficient of the x^r term of
the product of two power series?

i don't think it has a name …

it's just obvious :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top