Coefficient values in functions,

spatzbw
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I noticed these patterns when calculating some co-efficents in functions having this pattern. I would appreciate a better understanding of it, so if you can put in any input that may help, that would be awesome. Also, I tried to explain the pattern as best as I can.

Let a set A = {a1, a2, ..., an}, where a1 < a2 < a3 < ... < an. Let A:k:n be as such; To present the idea, let n =4. so A:1:4 = a1 + a2 + a3 + a4, A:2:4 = (a1)(a2) + (a1)(a3) + (a1)(a4) + (a2)(a3) + (a2)(a4) + (a3)(a4), A:3:4 = (a1)(a2)(a3) + (a1)(a2)(a4) + (a1)(a3)(a4) + (a2)(a3)(a4) and A:4:4 = (a1)(a2)(a3)(a4). So if A = {1,2,3,4,5}, A:1:5 = 15, A:2:5 = 2+3+4+5+6+8+10+12+15+20, and so on. Keep in mind that since for example in A:3:n, (ai)(am)(an), where i,m,n are all natural numbers less than or equal to n, uses the same terms from A, we do not reuse them as (am)(ai)(ak) or any other variation of those 3 numbers. My question is, is there a symbol that refers to this, if so what is it, and what math area does this most directly fall under so I an further research it. Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top