Coefficients in wave function for potential step

Nick O
Messages
158
Reaction score
8
Edit: I forgot to add the picture, and I'm having trouble adding it from Tapatalk. I'll add it soon.

I'm trying to understand the derivation in my textbook of the wave function for a potential step. The derivation reaches the step shown in the attached photo, which I am fine with.

However, the book then says:

One boundary condition is that the wave function ψ2(x) must remain finite, which means that the coefficient B2=0.

Why can't we use this same reasoning to eliminate B1 as well? Clearly the B1 term increases without bound as x approaches negative infinity, exactly as the B2 term does as x approaches positive infinity.

And yet, B1 is later solved in terms of k1, k2, and A1. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't add this to my previous post through Tapatalk. Sorry!
 

Attachments

  • uploadfromtaptalk1423187251955.jpg
    uploadfromtaptalk1423187251955.jpg
    40.6 KB · Views: 532
Never mind, my coffee must have been spiked or something. There is no imaginary number in the second wave function.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top