Coefficients using orthogonality relation

FatPhysicsBoy
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Have a solution for the temperature u(x,t) of a heated rod, now using the orthogonality relation below show that the coefficients a_n , n = 0,1,2,... can be expressed as:

a_n = \frac{2}{L} \int_{0}^{L} cos\frac{n\pi x}{L} f(x) dx

Homework Equations



\int_{0}^{L} cos\frac{n\pi x}{L} cos\frac{m\pi x}{L} dx = \left\{\begin{matrix}<br /> L &amp; n=m=0 \\ <br /> L\delta_{nm}/2 &amp; otherwise <br /> \end{matrix}\right.

u(x,t)=\frac{a_{0}}{2} + \sum_{n=1}^{inf} a_n cos(\frac{n \pi x}{L})exp[-\alpha (\frac{n\pi}{L})^2 t]

u(x,0) = f(x)

a_n = \frac{&lt;cos(\frac{n\pi x}{L}),f(x))&gt;}{{\left \| cos(\frac{n\pi x}{L} \right \|}^2}



The Attempt at a Solution





So I've tried doing this using the relation involving inner products above, I've also tried multiplying both sides of the equation f(x) = \frac{a_{0}}{2} + \sum_{n=1}^{inf} a_n cos(\frac{n \pi x}{L}) by cos(\frac{m \pi x}{L}) and integrating from 0 to L.

So going the inner product way, I think my problem is with the value of the norm squared because a similar issue turns up the other way (even though it is essentially the same thing). I get my expression for the norm and note that there are two terms with n so n = m therefore I consider the case where n = 0 therefore n = m = 0 and I get L as my norm squared. Then I consider the case where n > 0 then n = m != 0 , I then get L/2 as my norm squared. This is what doesn't make sense to me. I can get the right answer if I just consider n = m != 0 but I get a second one which isn't the answer if I consider n = m = 0.

Thank You.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think this issue has now been solved, thank you.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top