Coherent Light Waves: Interference & Diffraction Explained

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the concepts of coherent and non-coherent light waves, particularly in relation to interference and diffraction. Coherent light sources, such as lasers, exhibit clear interference effects due to the in-phase nature of their photons, while non-coherent sources display averaged interference effects. The conversation highlights the importance of coherence types: spatial coherence, which pertains to the size of the light source, and temporal coherence, which relates to spectral bandwidth. Practical applications, such as the Young's slit experiment and Mach-Zehnder interferometers, illustrate the differences in interference patterns produced by coherent versus non-coherent light sources.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of light wave properties and behavior
  • Familiarity with interference and diffraction phenomena
  • Knowledge of coherent versus non-coherent light sources
  • Basic principles of interferometry, including Young's slit and Mach-Zehnder setups
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the principles of Young's slit experiment in detail
  • Investigate the differences between spatial and temporal coherence
  • Learn about the applications of Mach-Zehnder interferometers in optics
  • Study the effects of coherence on diffraction patterns in various light sources
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, optical engineering, and anyone interested in the principles of light behavior, interference, and diffraction.

GrizzlyBat
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
So is this the ability for light waves to add up and subtract interms of interference? But I am confused as to what a non-coherent light sorce would be. I mean is it when the light waves are not organised enough? So there is no effect of interference through diffraction? or is it that there is interference, but we see the averaged effect and it is not that great?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Coherence simply means that photons with the same wavelength are in phase, as it were. And yes, interference effects are easier to see with a coherent light source, such as a laser. Nevertheless, interference effects can be seen with ordinary light sources--the colors one sees on the surface of a soap bubble or an oil slick, for example, are caused by destructive interference.
 
Yeah, that makes sense. So if I was to use a non-coherent light source, and did youngs-slit experiment, I should see diffraction? or do I have to use something like a lazer? I would think that I could use either but the laser would be more effective. Because more waves would be in phase to start with.
 
There are two main 'flavors' of coherence: spatial and temporal. Temporal coherence relates to the spectral bandwidth, while spatial relates to the size of the source.

Mach-Zender type interferometers work via temporal coherence, while Young-type interferometers work via spatial coherence.

Coherence, as a concept, is a statistical statement- if you know what the value of the field is here and now, how well can your predict the value over there at some future time?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
830