Coherent time vs duration time of the wave packet (photon)

AI Thread Summary
Coherence time and duration time of a photon burst are distinct concepts in wave physics. Coherence time is influenced by the frequency spread of a light beam and can be measured using interferometers, while coherence length relates to the apparent size of the light source. In the context of Young's double-slit experiment, if the time difference due to path length exceeds the duration of the photon bursts, the resulting waves are incoherent. For pulsed light, interactions between coherence time, bandwidth, and pulse duration can complicate measurements in interferometers. Understanding these relationships is crucial for analyzing light behavior in experiments.
coke
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
hi, i really confused about this two term. As i read from a book, ' in the Young's double slits experiment of light, if the time difference (that resulted from the path difference because of the two slits) is longer than the duration of each 'burst' (the photon),the received waves must come from different 'burst', which are unrelated and incoherent.'

i want to know if 'coherent time' = duration of the 'burst' (about nanosecond for white light). if they are equal, i can understanding the above statement. if they are not, can anyone explain clearly, in detail to me ? Thank you very very much!
 
Science news on Phys.org
"Coherence time" is related to the frequency spread (bandwidth) of a beam. Coherence time is most proeprly measured by a Mach-Zender/Michaelson interferometer- the coherence time is related to the difference in path lengths.

"Coherence length", sometimes called the coherence area, is related to the apparent size of a source, and is measured by a Young's double slit interferometer.

For pulsed light, I can see there being competition between the coherence time, the bandwidth, and the pulse duration, and it's not immediately clear what would happen in a Michaelson interferometer, except in the obvious cases of the pulses being coincident or completely missing each other.

Putting pulses through a double-slit interferometer poses no obvious difficulties, since the pulse width and size of the illuminated spot are not related to each other. Perhpas for sub fs pulses, there could be some interesting effects, but it could be hard to distinguish them from changes to a single-slit diffraction pattern.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top