Collecting air samples to test for primary pollutants.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Binary Star
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Test
AI Thread Summary
Collecting air samples for testing local air quality requires careful consideration of both the method and the storage containers. Transparent containers are essential for infrared testing, which may rule out options like ziplock bags. Alternatives such as glass or specialized sampling canisters should be considered to ensure accurate results. It's crucial to evaluate the sensitivity of the infrared equipment to distinguish between different air sources effectively. Finding the right collection and storage method is key to the success of the air quality analysis.
Binary Star
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a lab (Extended Essay, if you're familiar with the IB program) on the local air quality. I basically would need to collect some air samples to test, but I'm not sure how I would go about collecting appropriate samples of air. I'm also not sure in what sort of container I could place them in.

The container has to be transparent since I will be shooting an infrared beam through the air sample.

So, how could I go about collecting air samples, and what kind of containers do you suggest I get/make? I've got the rest of the lab set-up, but I'm stumped on how I would collect air samples. I guess I could just use ziplock bags and fill them with the 'air' in different areas of the city, but I'm not sure if that'd work. ANY ideas will be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without knowing what time constraints you face, I'll offer a suggestion that you look at the sensitivity of your IR before committing yourself too heavily --- can you distinguish between air you breathe and a ziploc filled from an auto/truck/bus tailpipe?
 
I have plenty of time ^_^.

I just need to figure out a good way to collect air samples, and a good way to store them so I can test them. I have two ways that I've thought of, and both require a way to store air samples.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top