Collection of Lame Jokes

  • Thread starter Thread starter quddusaliquddus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
24,140 replies · 3M views
DaveC426913 said:
Either I am a dunce, or you have a morbid sense of humour.
Yeah, Dave, I didn't get that one either.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
on Phys.org
DaveC426913 said:
Either I am a dunce, or you have a morbid sense of humour.

phinds said:
Yeah, Dave, I didn't get that one either.

He was carrying people on his neck! Didn't you get it?
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Aufbauwerk 2045
Stavros Kiri said:
He was carrying people on his neck! Didn't you get it?
Ah! No, I didn't.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
DaveC426913 said:
Ah! No, I didn't.
Took me some time too, but I thought it qualified as a good "groaner" ...
(See also #3503)
 
Last edited:
Stavros Kiri said:
He was carrying people on his neck! Didn't you get it?

I also didn't get it right away. An Englishman explained it to me. He understood it instantly. Think about why the brothers, who are from Scotland, carried people instead of buying a vehicle.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stavros Kiri
Aufbauwerk 2045 said:
I also didn't get it right away. An Englishman explained it to me. He understood it instantly. Think about why the brothers, who are from Scotland, carried people instead of buying a vehicle.
The problem was in the original wording. It talked of "taking people' and not 'carrying people'. I think you would need to be psychic to have got it with that word wrong. :smile:
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: fresh_42
sophiecentaur said:
The problem was in the original wording. It talked of "taking people' and not 'carrying people'. I think you would need to be psychic to have got it with that word wrong. :smile:
Wow! I'm either psychic!(?) ... or I actually evaluated the whole sentence, which talked about transportation business:
Aufbauwerk 2045 said:
They went into the transportation industry, taking people between Glasgow and nearby small towns.
I think it's fairly clear.
[but not to say the same about the neck part, I agree ...]
 
Last edited:
What will they think of next?

"Why does a chicken coop have 2 doors? Because, if it had 4 doors it would be chicken sedan."
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude, Stavros Kiri and BillTre
collinsmark said:
Why would cows be eating chickens in the first place? It just doesn't make sense. What is going on around me in this world?! :confused::woot::nb)
jtbell said:

+ check this out!:


It's called "Evolution" ... so to speak ...
 
Stavros Kiri said:
I think it's fairly clear.
[but not to say the same about the neck part, I agree ...]
Maybe they were traveling at a breakneck speed.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DrClaude and Stavros Kiri
Buckleymanor said:
Maybe they were traveling at a breakneck speed.
... or breakneck weight ...
 
so profound ! :rolleyes:

upload_2017-3-22_12-36-57.png
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Borg and OmCheeto
Rare funny video (Jim Carrey in his first steps ...):


And ... a later one:
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EnumaElish
fresh_42 said:
The pessimist sees only darkness in a tunnel.
The optimist sees the light at the end of the tunnel.
The realist recognizes the light is an oncoming trains.
The train driver sees three idiots on the track.
What if the realist is the optimist!? Then there is only two idiots!

Another similar:

The pessimist sees that the train has descended into the tunnel.
The optimist sees that it will come back out rising again.
The smart train driver has secretly abandoned the train inside the downhill tunnel, because it has no brakes!
Question: How many people inside the train wear tie?
Answer: Soon it won't matter! :biggrin::oldbiggrin::oldsurprised:
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: EnumaElish, AlexCaledin and nuuskur
Stavros Kiri said:
Another similar:

The pessimist sees that the train has descended into the tunnel.
The optimist sees that it will come back out rising again.
The smart train driver has secretly abandoned the train inside the downhill tunnel, because it has no breaks!
Question: How many people inside the train wear tie?
Answer: Soon it won't matter! :biggrin::oldbiggrin::oldsurprised:
Soon everyone will wear one.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Stavros Kiri
Borg said:
Why would the driver abandon the train if it's not broken? :oldconfused:
Without brakes and downhill (possibly with turns) it would (could) get off track soon ... and he is a whimp! ... + that was a joke! ...
 
Last edited:
Stavros Kiri said:
Without breaks and downhill (possibly with turns) it would (could) get off track soon ... and he is a whimp! ... + that was a joke! ...
You mean "without brakes"? :oldwink:
 
Borg said:
You mean "without brakes"? :oldwink:
Ooups! Typo, or mispelling. Thanks!
Stavros Kiri said:
because it has no breaks!
Out of edit time. Fixing here:
Stavros Kiri said:
because it has no brakes!

+ (edit) thanks to mentor who fixed the original too.
 
Last edited:
jtbell said:
The CBS Morning News had a report today on the Oakland Raiders football team's forthcoming move to Las Vegas:

"The Arc of the Lost Raiders"
You mean "Ark"?
With ark it will take them forever to get there ..., + on dry land?! ... It would be better if they had money to buy plane tickets! ...
 
This one I think is by Jay Leno.

Did you hear about the TSA's new slogan? "We handle more junk than eBay!"
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OCR and EnumaElish