Collection of Science Jokes P2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes Science
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a collection of science-related jokes and humorous anecdotes shared among forum members. A notable joke features a mathematician with a dog and a cow who are claimed to be knot theorists, leading to a playful exchange with a bartender. Other jokes include puns related to physics, such as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and light-hearted takes on mathematical concepts. The conversation also touches on the nature of humor in science, with members explaining the nuances of certain jokes, particularly those involving mathematical notation. Additionally, there are references to classic jokes that have circulated over the years, illustrating how humor can bridge complex scientific ideas with everyday life. Overall, the thread highlights the community's appreciation for clever wordplay and the joy of sharing science humor.
  • #3,511
Arjan82 said:
I don't get this
I think the Facebook user is adding confusion to this, yes. The hypotenuse has "length" zero, but non-zero projections on to both the horizontal and vertical axes.

As Orodruin notes, the diagram is a Minkowski diagram, widely used in relativity as a "map" of a two dimensional spacetime (one time, one space dimension) using the old "imaginary time" approach.
 
  • Like
Likes Arjan82 and collinsmark
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #3,512
Arjan82 said:
I just don't get it

As @Orodruin and @Ibix point out, it is a valid form of geometry, albeit non-Euclidean, akin to flat, Minkowski spacetime. However, the facebook user was overthinking it (you can probably ignore the facebook user's comments).

As a special bonus, you can even do "trigonometry"-like operations in such geometries of such right triangles, except instead of using sin(), cos(), and tan(), etc., you can invoke their hyperbolic equivalents, sinh(), cosh(), and tanh(), etc.
 
  • Like
Likes Arjan82 and BillTre
  • #3,513
Ibix said:
I think the Facebook user is adding confusion to this, yes.
Really.

My "poem" would be:
##H^2=A^2+B^2##
##H^2=i^2+1^2##
##H^2=-1+1=0##
##H=0##
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix and BillTre
  • #3,514
Ibix said:
I think the Facebook user is adding confusion to this, yes.
That is so weird though. Random Facebook comments are usually such a fount of indisputable knowledge … 🤔
 
  • Haha
Likes Ibix, BillTre and berkeman
  • #3,515
1721775577947.png
 
  • Haha
Likes davenn and dwarde
  • #3,516
berkeman said:

"I got to work at 10, then grabbed a latte. Then I headed over to the gym. Then me and a couple of friends went to the salad bar for a quick bite before heading to our cool new Tibetan themed meditation center. Then we had this all-hands townhall zoom meeting..."
 
Last edited:
  • #3,517
ohc=CLC79POPwIwQ7kNvgEnzaX0&_nc_ht=scontent-fra5-1.jpg
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes davenn and BillTre
  • #3,519
fresh_42 said:
That's cheating. If adding extra elements to aluminium could count as making it transparent, then they wouldn't have to wait until the 22nd century to invent it - they could have just dug up some corundum from the ground.
 
  • #3,520
1721879474913.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes dwarde, jtbell, dextercioby and 4 others
  • #3,522
You know, this just doesn't seem like a great idea to me ....

1722336357116.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes collinsmark, BillTre, fresh_42 and 2 others
  • #3,523
1722352762246.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes dwarde, davenn, Ibix and 2 others
  • #3,524
berkeman said:
Two things come to mind:

1. The objects in the left picture are ever so slightly bigger than the man in the second.
2. The instrument used for the left picture costs ever so slightly more than that used for the right.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and berkeman
  • #3,525
Orodruin said:
The instrument used for the left picture costs ever so slightly more than that used for the right.
Webb cost the better part of $10bn (I looked it up because I was just about to make a similar comment).
 
  • #3,526
1722554417345.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Ibix, BillTre and fresh_42
  • #3,527
1722582299795.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes BillTre, fresh_42, jack action and 4 others
  • #3,528
1722639174652.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes davenn, BillTre, jack action and 1 other person
  • #3,529
Screenshot 2024-08-02 at 4.31.33 PM.png
 
  • Like
Likes phinds and berkeman
  • #3,530
Screenshot 2024-08-02 at 4.28.09 PM.png
 
  • #3,531
Non Sequitur Comic Strip for August 04, 2024
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, BillTre and jack action
  • #3,532
“…when it is least convenient.”

1722819897531.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes phinds, jack action, Bystander and 3 others
  • #3,533
davenn said:
“…when it is least convenient.”

View attachment 349489
That was definitely one of the better ones! Last automatic update took hours!
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and BillTre
  • #3,534
ohc=Lgw_4D968XgQ7kNvgEtN6dq&_nc_ht=scontent-fra3-1.jpg
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and berkeman
  • #3,535
fresh_42 said:
Where is the joke? This is my wife’s last birthday cake:
1722833225001.jpeg

(Yellow candles were lit when it went ”live”)
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and fresh_42
  • #3,536
IMG_0497.jpeg
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and fresh_42
  • #3,537
1722962895886.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes davenn, dwarde, jack action and 3 others
  • #3,538
1723170119796.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Likes davenn, Tom.G, collinsmark and 4 others
  • #3,539
berkeman said:
A colleague used to edit an internal newsletter with things of professional interest for people in various scientific or numerate roles. Having the kind of sense of humour that would go well on here, he used that pie chart (without the key) as the logo. He was very disappointed to discover that the next editor had changed it to use our corporate standard colour scheme and ruined the joke.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes BillTre, nuuskur and berkeman
  • #3,540
Screenshot 2024-08-09 at 10.22.59 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes jack action and Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 459 ·
16
Replies
459
Views
33K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K