Collection of Science Jokes P2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes Science
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This thread features a collection of science-related jokes, puns, and humorous anecdotes, primarily focusing on physics, mathematics, and engineering concepts. The discussion includes various types of jokes, some of which are derived from literature, while others are original contributions from participants.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares a joke about a mathematician, a dog, and a cow, highlighting the humor in knot theory.
  • Another participant introduces a joke about Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in a romantic context.
  • Several jokes reference mathematical conventions, such as the use of epsilon in calculus, with some participants seeking clarification on the humor.
  • A joke about a communication between Americans and Canadians illustrates a humorous misunderstanding, with historical context provided by a participant.
  • Participants discuss the nature of jokes, including the structure of short jokes and the implications of scientific terminology in humor.
  • There are multiple jokes involving Heisenberg, with one participant noting the brevity of a specific version of the joke.
  • A humorous take on a scientific method is shared, with some participants expressing curiosity about the referenced group of scientists.
  • Another joke involves a metaphorical description of a woman's experience during childbirth, framed in scientific terms.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share jokes and humorous anecdotes without a clear consensus on any specific joke or concept. Some jokes prompt requests for clarification, indicating varying levels of understanding and appreciation for the humor presented.

Contextual Notes

Some jokes rely on specific scientific knowledge or conventions that may not be universally understood, leading to requests for explanations. The humor often hinges on wordplay and the intersection of scientific concepts with everyday situations.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in science humor, particularly in physics and mathematics, may find this collection entertaining and thought-provoking.

  • #2,431
...which does beg the brain teaser question, can you pass through a doorway so slowly [de Broglie Wavelength] that you diffract? What happens, or why not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2,432
Too many distractions (too much interaction with the environment) to walk through a doorway coherently.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
  • #2,433
mfb said:
Too many distractions (too much interaction with the environment) to walk through a doorway coherently.
Such as...?

There is one thing that ensures no one can run the experiment and get results even under ideal [Perfect] conditions.
 
  • #2,434
Radiation in both directions, electromagnetic fields from the human, collisions with gas molecules even in the best vacuum we could make. Probably even gravitational interactions at that level.
 
  • #2,435
mfb said:
Radiation in both directions, electromagnetic fields from the human, collisions with gas molecules even in the best vacuum we could make. Probably even gravitational interactions at that level.
Motion due to temperature is one problem.

But all that aside, even if we run it at near absolute zero in deep space while heavily shielded by a structure imposing zero net gravity, there is still a reason not mentioned as to why the experiment would not yield useful results...
 
  • #2,436
A human at absolute zero is dead, and I don't think you can create a condition where there is no gravitational influence leading to decoherence.
 
  • #2,437
Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 12.53.36 PM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, Hamiltonian and jack action
  • #2,438
Anti-anti-vax propaganda:

Screen Shot 2021-09-22 at 10.57.35 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jack action and Keith_McClary
  • #2,439
mfb said:
A human at absolute zero is dead, and I don't think you can create a condition where there is no gravitational influence leading to decoherence.
It still works if you're dead. And if what you say about gravity is true, then how could any deBroglie wavelength experiment work?

But that aside, how long would it take to run the experiment? If the door is about 1 meter wide, then the frozen human body needs to have a wavelength of about 1 meter. Assuming a mass of 100 Kg... given the required velocity, IIRC the universe isn't old enough to have run the experiment.
 
  • #2,440
BillTre said:
Anti-anti-vax propaganda:
What's this all about?
boone.JPG
 
  • #2,441
gmax137 said:
What's this all about?
View attachment 289540
Logo of the advertising company that did this.
The funeral home is a fake, website goes to a get a vax site.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: gmax137
  • #2,442
_nc_ohc=UWDvaSEp1ecAX9Drx8P&_nc_ht=scontent-dus1-1.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: collinsmark, DennisN, Keith_McClary and 2 others
  • #2,443
BillTre said:
The funeral home is a fake...
I wondered about that.
I am extremely skeptical of anything online these days.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
  • #2,444
Ivan Seeking said:
It still works if you're dead. And if what you say about gravity is true, then how could any deBroglie wavelength experiment work?
The experiments are done with much lighter objects.
But that aside, how long would it take to run the experiment? If the door is about 1 meter wide, then the frozen human body needs to have a wavelength of about 1 meter. Assuming a mass of 100 Kg... given the required velocity, IIRC the universe isn't old enough to have run the experiment.
Compared to the other obstacles I think this is a minor concern.
 
  • #2,445
mfb said:
The experiments are done with much lighter objects.
Cool. Let me see the proof.

mfb said:
Compared to the other obstacles I think this is a minor concern.
Government worker?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: mfb
  • #2,446
Cryonics - proof that cooler heads will prevail
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DaveC426913
  • #2,447
Ivan Seeking said:
Cryonics - proof that cooler heads will prevail
iriaue57i9y61.png
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN
  • #2,449
You know the really great thing about not drinking booze?

Not drinking booze.

I quit on my 21st birthday.
 
  • #2,450
Ivan Seeking said:
You know the really great thing about not drinking booze?

Not drinking booze.

I quit on my 21st birthday.
What little I drank, I am reducing even more. Not only does it give me murderous heartburn - which means I don't sleep, but - as the only driver in my fam - it can wreak havoc on evening plans. It's just too much of a hassle.
 
  • #2,451
DaveC426913 said:
What little I drank, I am reducing even more. Not only does it give me murderous heartburn - which means I don't sleep, but - as the only driver in my fam - it can wreak havoc on evening plans. It's just too much of a hassle.
Twice in my life I drank to excess, mostly to see what it was like. The resulting euphoria was negligible, the loss of dexterity and control annoying and the aftereffects painful. So I never developed the taste or the habit. Clearly I do not have the alcoholism gene.
 
  • #2,452
DaveC426913 said:
What little I drank, I am reducing even more. Not only does it give me murderous heartburn - which means I don't sleep, but - as the only driver in my fam - it can wreak havoc on evening plans. It's just too much of a hassle.
About once a year I get the feeling I'd like a drink. So I lie down until the feeling goes away. :)

I will have a little Dom if I buy it for my GF but only a half a glass or so. No sense ruining a hot date!
 
  • #2,453
Screen Shot 2021-09-24 at 8.18.30 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN
  • #2,454
Apparently I had not read the chapter ahead of time, so when my old-school Swiss physics professor walked in and introduced the concept of canonical coordinates, I thought he meant conical coordinates but was drunk.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: phinds
  • #2,455
Screen Shot 2021-09-25 at 11.08.18 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nuuskur and collinsmark
  • #2,456
First scientist - "I just discovered a faster than light particle"

Second Scientist - " I bet you didn't see that coming "
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, diogenesNY, BillTre and 3 others
  • #2,457
1632628839278.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, davenn, nuuskur and 2 others
  • #2,458
Screen Shot 2021-09-26 at 10.30.08 AM.png
 
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, Keith_McClary and Bystander
  • #2,459
1632714785993.png

prof. can we not do projectile motion problems without air resistance and instead do some real physics like unifying gravity with quantum mechanics??!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: phinds, Borg and nuuskur
  • #2,460
Screen Shot 2021-09-27 at 9.04.55 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, nuuskur, Hamiltonian and 1 other person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 470 ·
16
Replies
470
Views
36K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K