Collection of Science Jokes P2

In summary: Usually it's been commentated as being 'real'. Actually the joke dates back to the 30's and whether it's real or not cannot be said anymore.
  • #2,801
Screen Shot 2022-09-28 at 3.33.42 PM.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Likes Filip Larsen, davenn, Algr and 12 others
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2,802
BillTre said:
Cat-egory 3 hurricane.
Maybe they are fascist cats, that have turned into a Southern Hemisphere phenomenon.
 
  • Like
Likes Borg
  • #2,803
Time for some stellar astronomy jokes:

Galileo.jpg
Not Flat.jpg
No planet.jpg
Astronomy.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes davenn, jack action, pinball1970 and 3 others
  • #2,804
and sometimes because its fun to be a little mean spirited ...
1664883311944.png
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes DennisN and BillTre
  • #2,805
1664883428336.png
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, DennisN, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #2,806
1664883574565.png
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, collinsmark, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #2,807
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Likes mfb, DennisN, Demystifier and 3 others
  • #2,808
Screen Shot 2022-10-06 at 8.33.23 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes DennisN, gmax137, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #2,809
Why orthodox quantum mechanists believe in flat Earth

When we measure any small patch of Earth, experiments show that each patch is flat (up to local mountains and valleys, which are not important here). Therefore experiments are consistent with flat Earth. Sure, if we try to collect all patches into a single object we get a round Earth, but this is wrong because different patches are complementary. There is no single measurement of all patches at once, so object consisting of all patches at once is a counter-factual. Those who claim that Earth is round assume counterfactual definiteness (CFD), or realism (belief that there is measurement-independent reality). But CFD/realism is wrong, which saves flatness of Earth.
 
  • Like
Likes Nugatory, DrChinese, gentzen and 2 others
  • #2,810
Demystifier said:
Why orthodox quantum mechanists believe in flat Earth

When we measure any small patch of Earth, experiments show that each patch is flat (up to local mountains and valleys, which are not important here). Therefore experiments are consistent with flat Earth. Sure, if we try to collect all patches into a single object we get a round Earth, but this is wrong because different patches are complementary. There is no single measurement of all patches at once, so object consisting of all patches at once is a counter-factual. Those who claim that Earth is round assume counterfactual definiteness (CFD), or realism (belief that there is measurement-independent reality). But CFD/realism is wrong, which saves flatness of Earth.
There are a couple of things I need clarification on.

When you say 'complimentary' do you mean in a QM way or normal way?

Also why does measuring at the same time make a difference?

Say I make a measurement on a length of rod but my ruler is only part the length of the rod would it matter if I collated my measurements?

What if I was a little slow and measured part way and made a mark then went home and told my wife about my dilemma?
She is smarter than me explained the solution so I went back the next day and completed the measurement.
Two measurements separated in time but successfully completed.
Throw in an orientation in space for good measure, would this not be valid?

I know this is the joke section but I think we can agree you started it.
 
  • #2,811
The more I read about Bell's theorem on PF, the more am I convinced that AC/DC (sic!) meant something completely different with their song Hell's Bells than I previously thought!
 
  • #2,812
pinball1970 said:
When you say 'complimentary' do you mean in a QM way or normal way?
QM way is the normal way.
pinball1970 said:
Also why does measuring at the same time make a difference?

Say I make a measurement on a length of rod but my ruler is only part the length of the rod would it matter if I collated my measurements?
Otherwise it doesn't matter, but it matters if the obvious fact that Earth is flat depends on it.
pinball1970 said:
What if I was a little slow and measured part way and made a mark then went home and told my wife about my dilemma?
She is smarter than me explained the solution so I went back the next day and completed the measurement.
Two measurements separated in time but successfully completed.
Throw in an orientation in space for good measure, would this not be valid?
Bell was smart too (I'm not sure about his wife), and yet he concluded that QM is non-local. Being smart is not always an advantage.
pinball1970 said:
I know this is the joke section but I think we can agree you started it.
And now I continue it. :oldbiggrin:
 
  • Haha
Likes pinball1970
  • #2,813
Demystifier said:
QM way is the normal way.
Speaking of QM... USB connectors can also be in superposition:

USB-superposition.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes davenn, Wrichik Basu, 256bits and 2 others
  • #2,814
Did Schrödinger ever think about the consequences?

_nc_ohc=nLsNn9FBpREAX_kRjTC&_nc_ht=scontent-dus1-1.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes davenn, DennisN, berkeman and 3 others
  • #2,815
Demystifier said:
Bell was smart too (I'm not sure about his wife), and yet he concluded that QM is non-local.
Did you take the non-locality into account? When you measure length here, it instantaneously affects the measurements in Australia. And when you compare results you see that your measurements are incompatible with a flat Earth. It has to have a Bell shape.
 
  • Haha
Likes Tom.G
  • #2,816
martinbn said:
It has to have a Bell shape.
Did you mean Ball shape?
 
  • #2,817
Demystifier said:
Did you mean Ball shape?
Who is Ball?
 
  • #2,818
martinbn said:
Who is Ball?
He says he invented the sphere. Ironically, his claims turned out to be hollow.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Orodruin, DennisN, BillTre and 3 others
  • #2,819
martinbn said:
Who is Ball?
Mother Earth.
 
  • #2,821
mfb said:
Developer of the screw theory.
I'm not joking
So, he was a screwball?
 
  • Haha
Likes davenn
  • #2,825
311110541_795933438408718_1314652778575113669_n.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Nugatory, pinball1970, davenn and 2 others
  • #2,826
_nc_ohc=poN272ex9EkAX_4GLHe&_nc_ht=scontent-dus1-1.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Haha
Likes DennisN, pinball1970, Tom.G and 1 other person
  • #2,827
_nc_ohc=FSafaR6wRmgAX-TIW4F&_nc_ht=scontent-muc2-1.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes Grelbr42, DennisN, collinsmark and 7 others
  • #2,828
  • Wow
  • Haha
Likes DennisN and Demystifier
  • #2,829
Marie - more radiant.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN, pinball1970, jack action and 1 other person
  • #2,830
They say quantum tunneling only works on atomic particles, I would like to dispute this claim as I have personally experienced macro scale quantum tunneling many times this past year. I have even created a "device" which seems to be able to produce this effect at will, usually at the most inconvenient times. This experimental equipment can be created by anyone and the experiment is easily reproducible and repeatable to easily verify the results.

How is it that no matter well you place a nappy on a baby, their poop always finds a way to "tunnel" through it and onto the babies clothes!

If someone can be so kind as to do the necessary calculations and supply them to me for publishing, a Nobel prize for macro scale tunneling should be on it's way to me in next years awards :)
 
  • Haha
Likes DrClaude, Tom.G, berkeman and 1 other person
  • #2,832
I have seen quantum tunneling at a macro scale while its happening. Whenever I come back to my car after parking it someplace, I find the car next to me tunneling over the line into my space.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes DennisN, davenn and pinball1970
  • #2,833
1666388267375.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Grelbr42, DennisN, Wrichik Basu and 6 others
  • #2,834
BillTre said:
Wow, it made his hair grow back!
I found the right picture:
312595455_783268286345530_1047079074996705266_n.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DennisN, Wrichik Basu and BillTre
  • #2,835
Did Some scientists already have the hair so decided it had to be quantum mechanics as a career?

Lev Landau

1666614971484.png
 

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
12
Replies
397
Views
17K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
558
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
5
Views
775
Replies
14
Views
998
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Feedback and Announcements
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top