Collection of Science Jokes P2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes Science
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This forum discussion centers around a collection of science jokes, particularly those involving mathematics and physics. Notable jokes include a mathematician with a dog and cow discussing knot theory, and a play on Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. The humor often relies on advanced concepts such as the Jones polynomial and topological invariants, showcasing a blend of wit and scientific terminology. The conversation also touches on the cultural significance of these jokes within the scientific community.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of knot theory and the Jones polynomial
  • Familiarity with Heisenberg's uncertainty principle
  • Basic knowledge of topology and topological invariants
  • Awareness of mathematical humor and its conventions
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of knot theory in mathematics
  • Learn about the Jones polynomial and its applications
  • Study Heisenberg's uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of humor in scientific communication
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, educators, and anyone interested in the intersection of humor and science will benefit from this discussion.

  • #2,401
mfb said:
Calling that transparent aluminium is a bit like calling (quartz) glass "transparent silicon" or lead glass "transparent lead".
Glass IS transparent silicon dioxide. What is wrong with saying that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2,402
Ivan Seeking said:
Glass IS transparent silicon dioxide. What is wrong with saying that?
Silicon != Silicon Dioxide
 
  • #2,403
jbriggs444 said:
Silicon != Silicon Dioxide
Okay, transparent silicon.
 
  • #2,404
It is transparent silicon dioxide, but it is not transparent silicon, because it's not silicon.

If you ask for an oxygen bottle and get a bottle of water, ...
 
  • #2,405
mfb said:
It is transparent silicon dioxide, but it is not transparent silicon, because it's not silicon.

If you ask for an oxygen bottle and get a bottle of water, ...

Is there silicon in glass. Can you see through it. Or are you saying a silicon atom is no longer a silicon atom if it's bound to another atom?
 
  • #2,406
Ivan Seeking said:
Is there silicon in glass. Can you see through it. Or are you saying a silicon atom is no longer a silicon atom if it's bound to another atom?
We normally distinguish between wood, coal, diamond, water, oxygen and carbon-dioxide. We do not normally fill a CO2 fire extinguisher with "transparent carbon".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb and Bystander
  • #2,407
Here's a spoiler regarding the recent posts. The movie also involves whales, not shown in this video.

All right, fine. Here's a whale or two for good measure.

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #2,408
jbriggs444 said:
normally fill a CO2 fire extinguisher with "transparent carbon".
..., unless we're smuggling diamonds. (Presidio, great movie.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444, jim mcnamara and BillTre
  • #2,409
jbriggs444 said:
We normally distinguish between wood, coal, diamond, water, oxygen and carbon-dioxide. We do not normally fill a CO2 fire extinguisher with "transparent carbon".
CO2 is transparent, right?

I can play nitpicking games all day too. :)
 
  • #2,410
Ivan Seeking said:
CO2 is transparent, right?
Yes, but it's not carbon. See above. It contains carbon.
 
  • #2,411
Screen Shot 2021-09-16 at 9.26.38 AM.png
 
  • #2,412
mfb said:
Yes, but it's not carbon. See above. It contains carbon.
So you can see through the oxygen but not the carbon. So you see little black dots?
 
  • #2,413
Ivan Seeking said:
So you can see through the oxygen but not the carbon. So you see little black dots?
is this a serious question or a science joke?
 
  • #2,414
ergospherical said:
is this a serious question or a science joke?
I am pointing out the fallacy in his logic.
 
  • #2,415
Ivan Seeking said:
I am pointing out the fallacy in his logic.
what fallacy? the optical properties of compounds like carbon dioxide are determined by the vibrational modes of the molecule (e.g. CO2 has a symmetric stretch, an antisymmetric stretch and a bending mode), and these have frequencies in the infrared (not visible) region so it is transparent. [Although, the symmetric stretch doesn’t change the dipole moment, so actually isn’t even IR active]

It’s not like some types of individual atoms are opaque and others are transparent…
 
  • #2,416
It is easily possible to explain dark matter and dark energy. I have discovered a truly marvelous theory of this, which this room is too dark to write down.
 
  • #2,417
fresh_42 said:
It is easily possible to explain dark matter and dark energy. I have discovered a truly marvelous theory of this, which this room is too dark to write down.
Is this your last theorem, Mr. Freshmat? :oldbiggrin:
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb, Hamiltonian, Ivan Seeking and 1 other person
  • #2,418
_nc_ohc=ue9x9L0gDUsAX_Ip3TW&_nc_ht=scontent-lax3-2.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ivan Seeking, Hamiltonian and BillTre
  • #2,419
1631992241473.png

the Schrödinger equation did me bad! I went into it thinking its probably beautiful and elegant as it describes the fundamental nature of reality. I couldn't have been more wrong! solving the eqn for a measly H-atom makes me cri:cry::cry:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Ivan Seeking
  • #2,420
fresh_42 said:
It is easily possible to explain dark matter and dark energy. I have discovered a truly marvelous theory of this, which this room is too dark to write down.
Simple!
1631992769233.png

Where
E = dark energy
m = mass of dark matter

:angel:
 
  • #2,421
Wouldn't you have to replace that with the speed of dark? :oldtongue:
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: jack action, BillTre, Ivan Seeking and 1 other person
  • #2,422
Borg said:
Wouldn't you have to replace that with the speed of dark? :oldtongue:
That's just - C. The squared value is still a positive.

Easy Peasy

I don't know what all the fuss has been.
 
  • #2,423
My psychic prediction: Everyone who reads my post will secretly run a few calculations just to be sure what I said doesn't makes sense.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Hamiltonian
  • #2,424
Borg said:
Wouldn't you have to replace that with the speed of dark? :oldtongue:
Done.
 
  • #2,425
Screen Shot 2021-09-19 at 9.31.44 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: jasonRF, berkeman, collinsmark and 4 others
  • #2,426
1632083246114.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, jack action, collinsmark and 2 others
  • #2,427
Today I was walking through a doorway so slowly that I started to diffract. Scared the heck out of me!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, Keith_McClary and DaveC426913
  • #2,428
Ivan Seeking said:
Today I was walking through a doorway so slowly that I started to diffract. Scared the heck out of me!
And the room you were walking into had two tall, narrow windows?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: DennisN, Ivan Seeking and DaveC426913
  • #2,429
Screen Shot 2021-09-20 at 11.43.22 AM.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DennisN and Hamiltonian
  • #2,430
Keith_McClary said:
And the room you were walking into had two tall, narrow windows?
I only saw one. And I only saw one.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Keith_McClary, Hamiltonian and DaveC426913

Similar threads

  • · Replies 466 ·
16
Replies
466
Views
35K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
9K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K