Collection of Science Jokes P2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jokes Science
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a collection of science-related jokes and humorous anecdotes shared among forum members. A notable joke features a mathematician with a dog and a cow who are claimed to be knot theorists, leading to a playful exchange with a bartender. Other jokes include puns related to physics, such as Heisenberg's uncertainty principle and light-hearted takes on mathematical concepts. The conversation also touches on the nature of humor in science, with members explaining the nuances of certain jokes, particularly those involving mathematical notation. Additionally, there are references to classic jokes that have circulated over the years, illustrating how humor can bridge complex scientific ideas with everyday life. Overall, the thread highlights the community's appreciation for clever wordplay and the joy of sharing science humor.
  • #2,491
Screen Shot 2021-10-15 at 12.01.40 PM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes phinds, jack action and Keith_McClary
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2,492
Screen Shot 2021-10-17 at 8.44.42 AM.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Demystifier, phinds, artis and 4 others
  • #2,493
i-found-out-what-that-math-teacher-with-graph-pape.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes jack action
  • #2,494
1634539205017.png

From this tweet.

Some more from the replies to the above tweet:
  • A Regulated supply of Electronics engineers
  • A set of Set Theorists
  • A chord of string theorists.
  • An assembly of compiler designers.
  • A culture of microbiologists (or a colony)
  • A bouquet of botanists
  • ... and so on.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark, Keith_McClary and BillTre
  • #2,495
Screen Shot 2021-10-18 at 8.37.13 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
  • #2,496
  • #2,498
1634916466789.png
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Likes Demystifier, mfb, jack action and 1 other person
  • #2,499
Schrödinger's cat joke #368:

schrodinger-cat.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes Wrichik Basu, BillTre and phinds
  • #2,500
Screen Shot 2021-10-26 at 10.07.24 AM.png
 
  • #2,501
1635481523160.png
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre, fresh_42 and Keith_McClary
  • #2,502
Where the Stupid People are:

Screen Shot 2021-10-31 at 10.44.32 AM.png
 
  • Love
Likes Hamiltonian
  • #2,503
Screen Shot 2021-11-02 at 10.47.45 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes jack action
  • #2,504
Screen Shot 2021-11-03 at 9.54.18 AM.png
 
  • Love
Likes Hamiltonian
  • #2,505
1636349876996-png.291931
 
  • #2,506
Hamiltonian299792458 said:
1636349876996-png.png
Am I missing something?
EDIT: I was just seeing the JPG filename.
 
Last edited:
  • #2,507
We are missing non-zero entries in that matrix.
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian
  • #2,508
Screen Shot 2021-11-08 at 9.05.34 AM.png
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude and david2
  • #2,509
Who said squaring the circle was impossible?

_nc_ohc=PDh1LJiiWgAAX-dvco9&_nc_ht=scontent-dus1-1.jpg
 
  • #2,511
fresh_42 said:
Who said squaring the circle was impossible?

View attachment 292094
Gives a new meaning to "das Runde muss ins Eckige" ("the round one has to go into the angled/square one", originally referring to the round ball that has to go into the rectangular goal).
 
  • #2,512
mfb said:
Gives a new meaning to "das Runde muss ins Eckige" ("the round one has to go into the angled/square one", originally referring to the round ball that has to go into the rectangular goal).
Or as our American users would say: The egg must go between the suspenders.
 
Last edited:
  • #2,513
fresh_42 said:
Or as our American users say: The egg must go between the suspenders.
WITW? I missed the memo, I guess...
 
  • #2,514
berkeman said:
WITW? I missed the memo, I guess...
 
  • #2,515
Demystifier said:
That one class he skipped back when in quantum physics probabilities and Bells theorem would have come in handy now, the guy's thinking.
 
  • #2,516
Demystifier said:

If you were to force me to pick from {a,b,c,d} randomly, of course I'd get it wrong. So the answer I would choose, logically, is 0%. And even if I were to have chosen 0%, randomly, then 0% would have still have been the wrong answer, logically, thus 0% is the right answer. And that doesn't contradict the fact that it wouldn't be if I were to have chosen it randomly, which I didn't. Does it?
 
  • #2,517
Jarvis323 said:
Does it?
The logical paradox arises from self-reference ("... this question ..."), similarly to the liar paradox or Russell's antinomy.
 
  • #2,518
Life on Mars is confirmed!

Nasa received a message:

1636858256386.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and BillTre
  • #2,520
It's an absolute nightmare, Mars has more abandoned vehicles than the total road surface can carry.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes sysprog, BillTre and Keith_McClary

Similar threads

  • · Replies 460 ·
16
Replies
460
Views
33K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K