Colliding blocks attached to a spring - How is the spring compressed

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves two colliding blocks and a spring, requiring the calculation of maximum spring compression after a completely inelastic collision. The initial velocities and masses of the blocks are used to find the final velocity of the combined mass using the inelastic momentum formula. The kinetic energy of the system is then equated to the potential energy stored in the spring to find the compression. The error in the initial approach lies in the assumption that the velocity at maximum compression is not zero; it should be considered as such. Correcting this leads to a different calculation for spring compression.
tbomber
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
"A block of mass m1 = 2.4 kg slides along a frictionless table with a speed of 10 m/s. Directly in front of it, and moving in the same direction, is a block of mass m2 = 4.6 kg moving at 2.8 m/s. A massless spring with spring constant k = 1160 N/m is attached to the near side of m2, as shown in Fig. 10-35. When the blocks collide, what is the maximum compression of the spring? (Hint: At the moment of maximum compression of the spring, the two blocks move as one. Find the velocity by noting that the collision is completely inelastic to this point.)"

I cannot seem to get this answer right.

here is how I approached the problem:

using the inelastic momentum formula:

m1v1 + m2v2 = (m1+m2) * vfinal
(2.4 * 10) + (4.6 * 2.8) = (2.4 + 4.6)*v

solving for V... i get about 5.269 m/s (this is the velocity of the system)

THEN, in order to find the amount of compression, i use kinetic energy and potential energy in a spring:

.5kx^2 = .5mv^2
.5 * 1160 * x^2 = .5 * (2.4 + 4.6) * (5.269)^2

Solving for x... i get 0.409 m.

Unfortunately, this is wrong. Any help on solving this problem would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
when the spring compression is at a maximum, the blocks are at a turning point in the motion, v = 0
/s
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top