Collision of falling and thrown upward balls

AI Thread Summary
The total momentum of the system, which includes the two balls and the Earth, is conserved despite the gravitational force acting on the balls. However, the momentum of the two balls alone is not conserved during the collision due to the influence of gravity, which continuously increases their downward momentum. While momentum is not conserved exactly during the brief collision period, it can be approximated as conserved for calculations of speeds after the collision, with negligible error typically acceptable. To achieve accurate results, calculations should be performed in the reference frame of the center of mass of the two balls before converting to the Earth's frame. Overall, conservation of momentum is essential for understanding the dynamics of the collision.
nikolafmf
Messages
112
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am wondering if total momentum of the system is conserved in this case. Our system is consisted of two balls: one is falling vertically down to ground, another is thrown vertically up, so they collide in air. Is total momentum of the two balls conserved after the collision?

Now I know that if no external force is applied in the direction of momentum, is is conserved. But here there is gravitational force in the direction of the initial momentum. So I am not sure if total momentum before and after collision is conserved. Any help will be very appreciated.


Nikola
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nikolafmf said:
Hi,
I am wondering if total momentum of the system is conserved in this case.
Yes. (I could type in this part of my response before I even read the rest of your post :smile:)

Now I know that if no external force is applied in the direction of momentum, is is conserved. But here there is gravitational force in the direction of the initial momentum. So I am not sure if total momentum before and after collision is conserved. Any help will be very appreciated.
The total momentum of the system is conserved, because the system consists of *three* objects - the two balls and the earth. The momentum of the two balls, in isolation, is not conserved - it continuously increases in the downwards direction, for exactly the same reason that the momentum of a single ball, released from the top of a tall building, will increase in the downwards direction.
 
Nugatory said:
The total momentum of the system is conserved, because the system consists of *three* objects - the two balls and the earth. The momentum of the two balls, in isolation, is not conserved - it continuously increases in the downwards direction, for exactly the same reason that the momentum of a single ball, released from the top of a tall building, will increase in the downwards direction.

Just to be clear, I meant if the momentum of the two balls is conserved just before and just after the collision. Well, this "just" has to be clarified. The collision takes some time to happen, so momentum will not be conserved exactly. Question that bothers me here is, can we take that momentum (of two balls just before and just after the collision) is conserved, if we are going to calculate the speeds after the collision and we don't want to make large error (not larger than, say, 1%)?
 
The collision takes some time to happen, so momentum will not be conserved exactly.
If you just consider the momentum of the two balls, yes. Usually, this effect is negligible. And even if it is not: gravity will give a constant rate of momentum change ((m1+m2)*g), independent of the collision process.

Question that bothers me here is, can we take that momentum (of two balls just before and just after the collision) is conserved, if we are going to calculate the speeds after the collision and we don't want to make large error (not larger than, say, 1%)?
It is impossible to express this error relative to the total velocity without looking at the actual process.
 
The easiest way to approach this is to do your initial calculation in the reference frame of the Centre of Mass of the two balls. That will give you the approach and parting velocities of the balls. Then, if you want to know what the collision will look like in the Earth's frame, you can just introduce the velocity of the CM and find its resulting trajectory, under g, adding this value to the velocities of the two balls.

Don't even consider that you can do without Conservation of Momentum!
I don't understand that your problem with errors will be worse or better, depending on the calculation method. (Assuming a given accuracy of measurements)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top