Collision Prediction: Speedy Sue vs. Slow-Moving Van in a Wet Tunnel

AI Thread Summary
Speedy Sue, traveling at 31.5 m/s, is approaching a slow-moving van at 5.10 m/s, which is 105 m ahead in a wet tunnel. She can decelerate at 1.85 m/s² but does not need to stop completely to avoid a collision; she only needs to reduce her speed to match or fall below the van's speed. The key to solving the problem lies in determining the positions of both vehicles over time using kinematic equations to see if they intersect. Calculating the time it takes for Sue to decelerate and comparing her position with the van's position will reveal whether a collision occurs. The discussion emphasizes the importance of analyzing their positions as functions of time rather than just stopping distance.
chr1zis
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
here is the problem.. i keep getting yes for the first part and then around 163 for the second part. please help.

Speedy Sue, driving at 31.5 m/s, enters a one-lane tunnel. She then observes a slow-moving van 105 m ahead traveling in the same direction as her at 5.10 m/s. Sue applies her brakes but can decelerate only at because the road is wet. Will there be a collision?

yes or no?

If yes, determine how far into the tunnel and at what time the collision occurs. If no, determine the distance of closest approach between Sue's car and the van and enter 0.00 for the time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
chr1zis said:
Sue applies her brakes but can decelerate only at [...] because the road is wet. Will there be a collision?

I think a crucial piece of information is missing here. Also, please post what work you have done so far in attempting the problem
 
cepheid said:
I think a crucial piece of information is missing here. Also, please post what work you have done so far in attempting the problem
Speedy Sue, driving at 31.5 m/s, enters a one-lane tunnel. She then observes a slow-moving van 105 m ahead traveling in the same direction as her at 5.10 m/s. Sue applies her brakes but can decelerate only at 1.85 m/s^2 because the road is wet. Will there be a collision?

yes or no?

If yes, determine how far into the tunnel and at what time the collision occurs. If no, determine the distance of closest approach between Sue's car and the van and enter 0.00 for the time.

((i don't know if any of this is right, so please bear with me)) okay first i solved for t to get the time it took her to stop. -31.5=-1.85t.. t=17s. once i found that.. 17 x 5.10 = 86.7 .. then i took that and .. 86.7 x 105 = 191.7 .. then i got lost.. do i need to plug that into a kinematic equation or where do i go from here?
 
So you approached the problem by calculating how long it would take Sue to come to a complete stop. That may be useful. But consider this...she does not need to come to a complete stop to avoid a collision. All she need to do is decelerate to a final velocity less than or equal to the van's (5.10m/s), and this deceleration has to occur quickly enough that she achieves this final velocity before reaching the van. But that's really hard to calculate just like that...after all, her velocity is changing continously. I'd recommend using the given initial conditions and the kinematic relations to find the positions of each vehicle as a function of time: x(t) Then, if at some time t, the positions of the two vehicles are the same, they have collided. In other words, you want to see if those two functions intersect at any point.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top