Collisions between 3 particles (perfectly elastic)

AI Thread Summary
Three perfectly elastic particles A, B, and C collide on a smooth table, with A initially moving at 15 m/s towards B, which is at rest. The conservation of momentum and the coefficient of restitution equations are applied to determine the velocities after the collisions. Initial calculations yield incorrect velocities, prompting a reevaluation that results in B moving at 20 m/s after the first collision and A at 5 m/s. After the second collision, B's velocity becomes -4 m/s, indicating a reversal in direction and confirming that a third collision between A and B is inevitable. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the equations of motion and conservation principles in elastic collisions.
Taniaz
Messages
364
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Three perfectly elastic particles A, B, C with masses 4 kg, 2 kg, 3 kg respectively, lie at rest in a straight line on a smooth horizontal table. Particle A is projected towards B with speed 15 m/s and after A has collided with B, B collides with C. Find the velocities of the particles after the second collision and state whether there will be a third collision.

Homework Equations


v1-v2= -e (u1-u2)
Momentum before collision and momentum after collision equations using the principle of conservation of momentum.[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


Well I formed the equations using the equations stated above. Should I include the momentum of all 3 before collision together and do the same for after or should I do it separately between A and B first and then B and C? If I do it for all 3 together then how will this equation v1-v2= -e (u1-u2) change? e=1 for a perfectly elastic collision.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taniaz said:
should I do it separately between A and B first and then B and C?
Why do anything more complicated?
 
This is what I've done so far.
Let u1= velocity of A before collision, v1=velocity of A after collision
u2= velocity of B before collision, v2=velocity of B after collision
u3= velocity of C before collision, v3=velocity of C after collision

u1= 15 and u2 = 0
v1=? and v2=?

Momentum before collision = 4(15) + 0(2) = 60
Momentum after collision = 4v1 + 2v2 = 60 since momentum before collision = momentum after collision

AND v1-v2 = -e(u1-u2) where e=1 for a perfectly elastic collision.
v1-v2 = -1(15-0) so v1-v2 = -15 so v1= -15+v2

Plugging it into 4v1+2v2=60 gives us 4(-15+v2) + 2v2 = 60 so v2 = 60 m/s and therefore v1 = 45 m/s

Now I know the velocity with which B hits C so u2 = 45 and u3=0
And v2-v3= -1(u2-u3) and the same procedure...
 
Taniaz said:
v2 = 60 m/s and therefore v1 = 45 m/s
Anything strike you as surprising about those answers?
 
They're huge compared to the initial velocities

It's because of the coefficient of restitution
 
Btw, I'm still not sure of part g of the gravitational potential question :frown:
 
Taniaz said:
They're huge compared to the initial velocities

It's because of the coefficient of restitution
No matter how good the restitution, the KE cannot increase,
 
So I'm getting all the velocities as positive which means they're all traveling in the same direction after collision so a third collision is unlikely?
 
Taniaz said:
So I'm getting all the velocities as positive which means they're all traveling in the same direction after collision so a third collision is unlikely?
Too early to say. The velocities you quote are clearly wrong. Can you spot your mistake?
 
  • #10
Is it the equations?
 
  • #11
Ok I see it 6 v2=120 so v2=20
 
  • #12
So now I get v1 = 5m/s, v2= 20 m/s and v3=16m/s
 
  • #13
Taniaz said:
So now I get v1 = 5m/s, v2= 20 m/s and v3=16m/s

V2 = 20m/s is velocity of B after first collision ? What about velocity of B after second collision ? Will there be a third collision ?
 
  • #14
Velocity of B after second collision is -4 m/s
 
  • #15
So there is a possibility of a collision between A and B
 
  • #16
Taniaz said:
Velocity of B after second collision is -4 m/s
Right
Taniaz said:
So there is a possibility of a collision between A and B
Yes . But why use the word "possibility" ? They surely will collide .
 
Back
Top