B Electron Color & Wavelengths: Why Dependency?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter GAURAV DADWAL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Color Wavelengths
AI Thread Summary
The color of light is determined by its wavelength, but this does not directly translate to electrons having an associated color. Electrons exhibit quantum properties and can be described by wave functions, but they do not possess classical wave-like characteristics that correlate with color perception. Color is a physiological concept and cannot be mapped to frequency in a straightforward manner. Various types of waves, including sound and ultrasound, can have wavelengths similar to visible light, yet they do not produce color sensations. Ultimately, the perception of color depends on the sensitivity of specific receptors, rather than wavelength alone.
GAURAV DADWAL
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
I have read that color of light perceived by us depend on its wavelength since light is wave and also electron has wave like character that means electron has wavelength .Does that mean that electron has a color associated with it . I think its not but why .also I'm not able to understand why does color of light depend on its wavelength
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Color is not a physical but a physiological concept, and you cannot simply map color to a frequency in a one-to-one way.

Electrons have quantum character as any matter in the universe but no wave-like properties. In non-relativistic Quantum mechanics a single electron can be described by a complex valued field, obeying the Schrödinger equation (or better Pauli equation if you include spin as you should for the electron), which has wave-like solutions.

However it's not a classical field like, e.g., the electromagnetic field, either. The modulus squared of the wave function rather gives the probability distribution to find the electron at a given place when looking for it at a given time: ##P(t,\vec{x})=|\psi(t,\vec{x})|^2## (here I left out the spin-degree of freedom for simplicity).
 
Sound is also a wave. An elastic wave. Elastic waves induced in solids by thermal motions may have wavelengths all the way down to a few angstroms. Some will be in the range of wavelengths for visible light. However you cannot see them and there is no sensation of color produced by these waves.
Actually even the medical ultrasound nowadays reaches into GHz so the wavelength in water (or tissue) will be in the range of hundreds of nano-meters, same as for visible light. But again, you don't see the colors if they use it to scan the eye.

So the point is that the wavelength is not all it matters. Each receptor (eye included) is sensitive to a specific type of wave.
 
  • Like
Likes GAURAV DADWAL
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top