Combinations & Counting: Is There a Proven Formula?

AI Thread Summary
Combinations are indeed considered an application of the counting principle, as they relate to permutations. The combination formula C(n,p) = (n!)/(p!)(n-p!) is used to calculate the number of ways to choose p elements from a set of n elements. This formula confirms the relationship between combinations and permutations. The discussion also touches on the logical containment of sets, illustrating how subsets relate to one another. Overall, the thread clarifies the mathematical connections between these concepts.
skrying
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Is it fair to say combinations are just an application of the counting principle? I already understand that permutations are just an application of fundamental principle and that combinations are just an application of permutations. If it's fair to say that combinations are in fact, just an application of the counting principle, then would their be a specific formula that proves as such?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
the combination formula is : C(n,p) = (n!)/(p!)(n-p!) with n>p

is that what you have meant? :S
 
If A is completely contained in B, and B is completely contained in C, then A is completely contained in C.
 
Reply to A I and Who..

Yes, that was what I was looking for. Thank you for your help!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top