Combinatorial Number Theory Problem

Mathguy15
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I would like to see a solution to the following problem:

Let A be a finite collection of natural numbers. Consider the set of the pairwise sums of each of the numbers in A, which I will denote by S(A). For example, if A={2,3,4}, then S(A)={5,6,7}. Prove that if S(A)=S(B) for two different finite sets of natural numbers A and B, then |A|=|B|, and |A|=|B| is a power of 2.

I find this problem interesting, but I am working on other problems. Anyone have ideas?

Thanks,
Mathguy
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You haven't defined |A| for this situation.
 
For a set C, |C|=the cardinality of C.
 
Mathguy15 said:
Hello,

I would like to see a solution to the following problem:

Let A be a finite collection of natural numbers. Consider the set of the pairwise sums of each of the numbers in A, which I will denote by S(A). For example, if A={2,3,4}, then S(A)={5,6,7}. Prove that if S(A)=S(B) for two different finite sets of natural numbers A and B, then |A|=|B|, and |A|=|B| is a power of 2.

I find this problem interesting, but I am working on other problems. Anyone have ideas?

Thanks,
Mathguy



Well, if one considers zero a natural number (many do) then both claims above are false, as \{2,3,4\},\{0,2,3,4\} , otherwise...perhaps by induction on |A|+|B| ...

DonAntonio
 
Maybe I'm missing something, but it looks like for A = {1,2,3,4,5,6,7} and B = {1,2,3,5,6,7}

S(A) = {3,4, ... 12,13} = S(B), but |A|=7 and |B|=6

Maybe there should be some other restrictions on A and B?

(guessing) If neither A nor B may be a subset of the other, then consider {1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9}, {1,2,3,5,7,8,9} . Cardinalities 8 and 7.
 
Great Scott, you may be right catellus!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top