Combinatorics: 16 People Seated in a Row/Circle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Finsfan342
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Combinatorics
Finsfan342
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In how many ways can 16 people be seated:

A. In a row, if 4 of the 16 do not want to sit next to one another

B. In a row, if 3 of the 16 must be seated next to one another

C. In a circle, if 3 of the 16 must be seated next to one another

D. In a circle, if 4 of the 16 do not want to sit next to one another

These are my answers,

A. 16! - 13!4! - 14!3! - 15!2!, I'm not sure if I should include the 14!3! and 15!2!

B. 14!3! +15!2!, same situation as A

C. 12!3! + 13!2!, Little confused with the circle situation

D. 15! - 12!4! - 13!3! - 14!2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Finsfan342 said:
In how many ways can 16 people be seated:

A. In a row, if 4 of the 16 do not want to sit next to one another

B. In a row, if 3 of the 16 must be seated next to one another

C. In a circle, if 3 of the 16 must be seated next to one another

D. In a circle, if 4 of the 16 do not want to sit next to one another

These are my answers,

A. 16! - 13!4! - 14!3! - 15!2!, I'm not sure if I should include the 14!3! and 15!2!

B. 14!3! +15!2!, same situation as A

C. 12!3! + 13!2!, Little confused with the circle situation

D. 15! - 12!4! - 13!3! - 14!2!

B. Wrap the special 3 together with duct tape and consider them to be one object. You then have 14 objects to arrange, which can be done in 14! ways. But the special 3 can be arranged in 3! ways, so there are 14! 3! ways in all.

For A, I would try combining the method of B with Inclusion/Exclusion.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top