Comet Decay: Understanding the Forces Impacting It

  • Thread starter Thread starter pixel01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Comet
AI Thread Summary
Comets consist of a nucleus and a long tail, with the gravitational force of the core being too weak to retain tail particles, leading to decay over time. As a comet loses mass, its active area, which emits gas and dust, shifts due to changes in shape and size. The active area is not permanent, as dust accumulation can cover it, reducing the melting effect of solar heat. Consequently, other regions of the comet may become active as the original active area becomes inactive. Overall, the decay of comets is a gradual process influenced by these dynamics.
pixel01
Messages
688
Reaction score
1
I know that a comet often has a nuclea and a very long tail. the gravitation force of the core on the tail particles must be very weak and they will not have opportunity to come back to the core. So consequently, the comet will decay over time won't it? Is that right?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Yes. The mass of a comet will decrease over time. The 'Active area' of a comet describes that which emits gas and dust and since these gases and dust are effectively lost, (i.e. the mass decreases) the active area moves around since the comet changes shape/size. Normally, I think it is believed that the active area's do not exist forever since a layer of dust will build up and cover - drowning out the melting effect of the solar heat. Other regions of the comet may become active instead.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...
Back
Top