Cometologist Brian Marsden Obit

  • Thread starter Thread starter epenguin
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Brian Marsden was renowned for accurately predicting the return of Comet Swift-Tuttle, associated with the Perseid meteor shower, by challenging the conventional return date of 1981 and asserting it would return in 1992. He gained early recognition for his expertise in calculating planetary positions and comet orbits while still in school. In 1998, he sparked controversy by suggesting that asteroid 1997 XF11 could collide with Earth in 2028, although it was later deemed not a threat, leading to discussions on public communication regarding astronomical risks. Marsden also played a significant role in the 2006 demotion of Pluto from a major to a minor planet. His contributions have left a lasting impact on the field of cometology and public understanding of celestial events.
epenguin
Science Advisor
Messages
3,637
Reaction score
1,013
"best known for his prediction of the return of SwiftTuttle, the comet associated with the spectacular annual shower of the Perseid meteors"
"conventional wisdom was that it would return around 1981. Marsden strongly suspected, however, that the 1862 comet was identical with one seen in 1737, and this assumption allowed him to predict that Swift-Tuttle would not return until late 1992, 11 years later than previously thought. His prediction proved to be correct."

"While still a schoolboy, he became an expert in calculating the positions of the planets and the orbits of newly discovered comets. At that time, only a few other people could make these laborious calculations... by the time he graduated, he had already developed something of an international reputation for the computation of orbits of comets."

"In 1998 Marsden became involved in controversy when he suggested to a New York Times journalist that a newly discovered asteroid, two kilometers across, might collide with the Earth in 2028. The asteroid, called 1997 XF11, was, however, soon found not to be a threat and Marsden later explained that he had said there would have been a collision “only under highly unusual circumstances”. The episode initiated a lively debate about the way astronomers should best inform the public about possible threats of such collisions.

He was again in the news when he played a key role in the demotion of Pluto from the status of major to minor planet in 2006."

Quotes from Times obit. I don't know whether this link works or works permanently.

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/obituaries/article2822056.ece
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top