Comments on Toy Principle Bundle

  • Thread starter selfAdjoint
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Principle
In summary, the conversation is about keeping comments and discussions about the development of a toy bundle in a separate thread to avoid interrupting the main thread. The idea is well-respected and a tutorial on the principal bundle is considered useful. The next post will be about the connection 1-form and the speaker is checking references for accuracy. The spelling of "fibre" versus "fiber" is also mentioned.
  • #1
selfAdjoint
Staff Emeritus
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
6,892
11
As I said on the Toy Bundle thread, I want to keep the comments about than development over here, so the "didactic flow" of the main thread won't be interrupted with material that, however well taken, is distracting to readers. Thank you for your consideration.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Having a separate thread for comments is a good idea and hopefully all will respect the partition. Also principal bundle seems to be a really useful construct, so its great to have a tutorial on it!
 
  • #3
I'll do the next post tomorrow. I really want to have this correct, and I'm checking Nash & Sen and Nakahara on the connection 1-form.

BTW, all the books say "fibre" bundles. But I learned "fiber" spaces in Algebraic Topology all those moons ago, and I am going to stick with the US spelling.
 
Back
Top