Commutation between operators of different Hilbert spaces

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the commutation relations between the spin operator ##S## and the orbital angular momentum operator ##L## in multi-electron atoms, emphasizing that these operators act on wavefunctions in different Hilbert spaces. It clarifies that the commutator can indeed be calculated by considering the tensor product of the respective Hilbert spaces. The operators are represented as tensor products, allowing for the calculation of the commutator ##[\hat{L} \otimes \hat{I}_{spin}, \hat{I}_{spatial} \otimes \hat{S}] = [\hat{L}, \hat{I}_{spatial}] \otimes [\hat{I}_{spin}, \hat{S}]##. The discussion concludes that both operators commute when acting on vector-valued functions in the combined Hilbert space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and angular momentum operators
  • Familiarity with Hilbert spaces and tensor products
  • Knowledge of wavefunctions and their representation in quantum mechanics
  • Basic linear algebra, particularly matrix operations and vector spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of tensor products in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the representation of angular momentum operators in quantum systems
  • Explore the concept of vector-valued functions in Hilbert spaces
  • Investigate the implications of commutation relations in quantum mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, students of quantum mechanics, and researchers working on multi-electron atomic systems will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum operators and their commutation properties.

Wminus
Messages
173
Reaction score
29
Hi!

If I have understood things correctly, in a multi-electron atom you have that the spin operator ##S## commutes with the orbital angular momentum operator ##L##. However, as these operators act on wavefunctions living in different Hilbert spaces, how is it possible to even calculate the commutator?

I mean, you can't calculate the commutator between ##\hat{H} = i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}## and ##\hat{p}= \frac{\hbar}{i} \vec{\nabla}## precisely because of different hiblert spaces, so why is ##L## and ##S## different?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wminus said:
I mean, you can't calculate the commutator between ##\hat{H} = i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t} and ##\hat{p}= \frac{\hbar}{i} \vec{\nabla}## precisely because of different hiblert spaces
At first note that usually ##\hat H## is used for the Hamiltonian which isn't identical with the temporal derivative operator.
Anyway, what you say here is wrong You surely can calculate that commutator and its really straight-forward. You just should consider the position-space wave-function together with its temporal dependence and calculate ## [ i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t},\frac{\hbar}{i} \vec{\nabla}]\Psi(\vec x,t)##. Also there is only one Hilbert space here, the space of square-integrable complex valued functions.

And about the commutator of spin and orbital angular momentum operators. Here there are two Hilbert spaces and the abstract quantum state of the system is a member of the tensor product of these two Hilbert spaces, so we have ## |\Psi\rangle=\sum_{nm} c_{nm}|\Phi_n\rangle\otimes |\Sigma_m\rangle## where ## \{|\Phi_n\rangle\}## is a basis for the spatial Hilbert space and ## \{|\Sigma_m\rangle\}## is a basis for the spin Hilbert space. The operators are tensor products of operators acting on each Hilbert space too. So instead of ## \hat L ## or ## \hat S##, we should have ## \hat L \otimes \hat I_{spin} ## and ## \hat I_{spatial} \otimes \hat S##.
Now we can calculate the commutator: ## [\hat L \otimes \hat I_{spin},\hat I_{spatial} \otimes \hat S]=[\hat L,\hat I_{spatial}]\otimes [\hat I_{spin},\hat S]##.
 
  • Like
Likes Wminus
What @Shyan says is correct. But I think that, for practical calculations, the following point of view is more convenient.

The tensor product Hilbert space ##L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{3})\otimes\mathbb{C}^{2}## of the two spaces ##L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{3})## and ##\mathbb{C}^{2}## is isomorphic to the Hilbert space ##L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{3},\mathbb{C}^{2})##, which is the space of square integrable vector-valued (over ##\mathbb{C}^{2}##; in the integral expression of the inner product, one uses the natural inner product on ##\mathbb{C}^{2}## rather than the complex modulus of ##\mathbb{C}##) functions on ##\mathbb{R}^{3}##.

In this way, both the orbital angular momentum and the spin operators act always on these vector-valued functions on ##\mathbb{R}^{3}##. But the angular momentum operators are given by the usual differential operators and act componentwise, while the spin operators are given by the usual matrices and act on the components of the functions (and thus mixing them), i.e.,

$$
S\left(\begin{array}{c}
A\\
B
\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{cc}
a & b\\
c & d
\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{c}
A\\
B
\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}
aA+bB\\
cA+dB
\end{array}\right)$$ and $$
L\left(\begin{array}{c}
A\\
B
\end{array}\right)=\left(\begin{array}{c}
LA\\
LB
\end{array}\right)$$

You can easily check that the two operators commute.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
754
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K