Commutator of 4-momentum and position

kilokhan
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Is there a commutation relation between x^{\mu} and \partial^{\nu} if you treat them as operators? I think I will need that to prove this
<br /> [$J J^{\mu \nu}, J^{\rho \sigma}] = i (g^{\nu \rho} J^{\mu \sigma} - g^{\mu<br /> \rho} J^{\nu \sigma} - g^{\nu \sigma} J^{\mu \rho} + g^{\mu \sigma} J^{\nu<br /> \rho})$<br />
Where the generators are defined as

<br /> <br /> $J J^{\mu \nu} = i (x^{\mu} \partial^{\nu} - x^{\nu} \partial^{\mu})$<br />
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, I found the appropriate relation, \partial_{\mu}x^{\nu}=g^{\mu \nu}

But I'm not entirely sure why this is true. If someone could explain that would be great.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top