Compactification of M Theory on Smooth G2 Manifolds

d.hatch75
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am currently reading the paper given here by Acharya+Gukov titled "M Theory and Singularities of Exceptional Holonomy Manifolds", and in particular right now am following section 4 where the field content of the effective 4-dimensional theory is derived by harmonic decomposition of the 11D bosonic fields compactified over a smooth G_2 manifold. I accept the reasoning behind the derivation of the scalar and gauge fields in terms of the Betti numbers for the manifold, and understand why b_1=0 (and so there's no need to take the ansatz of a term summing over harmonic 1-forms on the compact space). However, there is no mention of a possible term that sums over harmonic 0-forms on the compact space, which as I understand it would lead similarly to b_0 3-form gauge fields in the N=1 theory in 4D, which to me doesn't sound like a trivial result that's not worth mentioning. Since in general we don't necessarily have b_0=0 for G_2 manifolds, is there a particular reason why one does not write this ansatz?

I am most likely missing something embarrassingly obvious, but try as I might, I cannot see it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, I've answered my own question with the help of my supervisor. It appears that taking b_0=1 (as is the case for the G_2 manifolds under consideration) indeed results in a single 3-form gauge field A_3 in the effective 4D theory via this particular KK ansatz, and the terms containing A_3 consist only of a kinetic term of the form F_4 \wedge *F_4 for F_4 = dA_3. This is because any interaction terms containing A_3 resulting from compactification of the Chern-Simons term in 11D will necessarily be a p-form with p>4, and so they will vanish when integrated over the 4D spacetime. The kinetic term after integration contributes a cosmological constant, which is interesting in itself but not all that relevant to a field theory discussion, so I am satisfied that my query has been resolved.
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...

Similar threads

Back
Top