Compactness with accumulation points

  • Thread starter Thread starter sazanda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points
sazanda
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let K be a subset of R. Prove that if every sequence in K has an accumulation point, then K must be compact.

Homework Equations



I tried to proof it below. Am I on the right track?


The Attempt at a Solution



My intuition;

Let x_n be sequence in K whose accumulation point is x, then there is a sub-sequence.
x_n_k converges to x.
Since sub-sequence x_n_k converges to x, x_n_k is a Cauchy sequence.
We know that Cauchy sequences are bounded. Thus x_n is bounded. so K is bounded.

Since all accumulation points are in K so K is closed.

By Heine-Borel Thm, K is compact.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite. I think you're better off showing the equivalent (each implies the other):

if K is not compact, there exists a sequence without an accumulation point.
 
sazanda said:
x_n_k is a Cauchy sequence.
We know that Cauchy sequences are bounded. Thus x_n is bounded.
Here you appear to be saying that if a sequence has a bounded subsequence, the sequence is bounded. Consider 1/2, 2, 1/3, 3, 1/4, 4, ...
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top