Comparing dQ/dt & dT/dt of a Cube & a Globe

  • Thread starter Thread starter campa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube
AI Thread Summary
When comparing a globular object and a cube of the same volume, the rate of heat transfer (dQ/dt) is higher for the globular object due to its greater surface area relative to volume. The rate of temperature change (dT/dt) is also higher for the globular shape for the same reason. The cube has a smaller surface area, resulting in slower heat dissipation. This relationship can be mathematically demonstrated by analyzing the surface area and volume equations for both shapes. Ultimately, the spherical shape is more efficient in heat transfer compared to the cube.
campa
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
If there is a globular object and cube which have the same volume and you heat both of these objects in same amounts of heat and leave these to cool down
1)dQ/dt of which one is higher? If so why?
2)dT/dt of which one is higher? if so why?
t-time
Q-energy
T-temperature
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming both objects have the same material properties then the greater the surface area the greater the rate of change of energy/temperature. The cube will have a smaller surface area than then globular object, let's say a sphere. You can prove this by setting the volumes equal to each other, make both volumes in terms of one parameter like the radius of the sphere or the length of the cube. Then you can determine the surface areas of both and compare.
 
I thought it was exactly the opposite : round shapes have the maximum containance (volume resp. surface) at equal containing (surface resp. perimeter)...??
 
For a spherical shape, the volume to surface area relation simplifies to

\frac{\frac{4}{3}\pi r^3}{4\pi r^2} = \frac{r}{3}

A cubic:

\frac{8R^3}{24R^2} = \frac{R}{3}

Note for the same volume R > r in all cases so I believe the cube would dissipate heat faster.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top