Comparing Energy Conversion Rates of Photons and Solar Panels

  • Thread starter Thread starter DoubleHelix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing experiments to compare energy conversion rates between solar cells and solar panels. The experiments will utilize a standard 150W light bulb as a consistent energy source, rather than relying on sunlight, to measure efficiency accurately. Participants clarify that the light bulb should illuminate the solar cell, allowing for power measurement. Using the light bulb simplifies the process, as measuring solar power directly from the sun can be complicated due to atmospheric interference. The consensus emphasizes the practicality of using a controlled light source for the experiments.
DoubleHelix
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Part of my Physics Planning paper says this:
"You are to design laboratory experiments to compare the energy conversion rates of the two systems (one using photons to release electrons in a solar cell and one using a solar panel to heat water), in order to find out which is the more efficient. The energy source should be a standard 150W light bulb connected to the 230V mains.

What does the phrase in bold mean? Surely the bulb wouldn't be connected to the mains, it would be connected to the solar cell which I am testing right? Or am I being totally dense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe you must use the light bulb as a source of energy (light). The light from the light bulb falling on the solar cell will produce power... You can measure this power with whatever means I guess...
 
Ah thanks so much! I assumed I'd be using the Sun as it is called a solar cell but yes it makes more sense to use a light bulb so I know the power of it, it'd be difficult finding the power of the Sun that reaches the surface with all that atmosphere and stuff in the way. I guess I was being totaly dense after all. :D
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top