Comparing NEP and noise temperature?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quark314
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Noise Temperature
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on comparing noise equivalent power (NEP) and noise temperature in the context of photon detectors, specifically kinetic inductance detectors (LEKIDs). The relationship between noise temperature and NEP can be expressed using the formula Te = NEP/kB*B, where Te is the noise temperature, kB is Boltzmann's constant, and B is the system bandwidth. The conversation highlights the importance of impedance matching when assessing noise contributions from amplifiers and detectors. Additionally, a reference to Jonas Zmuidzinas's 2012 paper in the Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics is provided for further insights on amplifier noise in kinetic inductance detectors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of noise equivalent power (NEP) in photon detectors
  • Familiarity with noise temperature concepts in electronic systems
  • Knowledge of kinetic inductance detectors (LEKIDs)
  • Basic principles of impedance matching in electronic circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation of noise temperature for photon detectors
  • Study the implications of impedance matching in amplifier and detector systems
  • Explore the detailed findings in Jonas Zmuidzinas's 2012 paper on amplifier noise
  • Investigate practical electronics considerations for kinetic inductance detectors
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and engineers working with photon detection systems, particularly those involved in the design and analysis of kinetic inductance detectors and their associated electronics.

quark314
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
So I don't have a lot of noise theory background (or, really, any) and I'm having trouble with this. I'm hoping someone can expalin and/or point me to some good resources for looking these things up (I have access to a good academic library, so I should be able to get any not-too-obscure resource).

I have a pair-breaking-based photon detector and an amp. I know the noise temperature for the amp, and I know the NEP for the detector and I need to compare them (to make sure I'm not going to be amp noise limited). Is there a reasonable way to convert between noise temp and NEP?

Alternatively, in principle I know everything about the detector (I designed it), so I suppose I ought to be able to calculate the noise temperature of the detector, but I don't know how. What about if I imagine I am photon (shot) noise limited in the detector? (not quite true, but a reasonable simple case to start with). How would one calculate the noise temp of the detector then?
 
Science news on Phys.org
I don't think the two are equivalent, when talking about noise temperature it is implied that the amplifier is impedance matched to the source. I am not sure how you would apply that to a "generic" detector.
However, there is nothing stopping you from just relating them using Te=NEP/kB*B, where B is the bandwidth of your system. Then Te would be the temperature of a resistor with some value R that is sending out a noise power equivalent to your NEP.

But again, I suspect this would only be suitable for a detector that is actually matched to the load, say a power detector in a MW system.


Btw, what kind of detector are we talking about? Kinetic indctance?
 
f95toli said:
what kind of detector are we talking about? Kinetic indctance?

Yes, I'm getting together a test setup for a LEKID. Finding I've been spending too much time worrying about the solid state theory end of things, and not nearly enough time thinking about the practical electronics side of things.

Thanks for the response.

For future folks finding this thread by googling their problems, there's some helpful info for amp noise in kinetic inductance detectors in Jonas Zmuidzinas's 2012 paper in Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K