Comparing Nuclear and Neutrino Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter WMGoBuffs
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutrino Nuclear
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the future of nuclear physics and neutrino physics, particularly in the context of potential funding and research opportunities over the next two decades. Uncertainties in the national budget pose challenges for these fields, with concerns that funding cuts could lead to the closure of facilities like Jefferson Lab, while Brookhaven may remain operational. Despite these worries, there is optimism regarding the construction of the Rare Isotope Accelerator (RIA) and the upcoming operation of the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS), suggesting a more promising outlook for low energy nuclear physics compared to high energy physics. The future of neutrino detectors and experiments remains uncertain, highlighting the need for ongoing assessment of funding trends and research priorities in these areas.
WMGoBuffs
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I've got a couple options for summer research, and I was wondering what the board's views on the fields of nuclear physics and neutrino physics were. Where do you think these two fields will go in the next twenty years? Will they be funded regardless of the next US administration? Is there decent money in it?

Just a few light questions...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's hard to say where nuclear and particle physics will be in 20 years in this country due to uncertainties in the national budget.
A while back there was an article in Science about in a worst case funding situation the DOE would shut down Jefferson Lab and keep Brookhaven open. This would be a major blow to the nuclear physics community but I don't think we will necessarily see a worst case funding scenario.
On the brighter side I think the Rare Isotope Accelerator (RIA) is still going to be built and the SNS will be operational in a few years. So to me it appears the future of low energy nuclear physics is possibly brighter than high energy nuclear physics. I'm not sure what the future holds for neutrino detectors & experiments in this country.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
82
Views
7K
Back
Top