Comparing Radio Waves: Short Wave vs. Phone/Radio

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the comparison between short wave radio signals and mobile phone/radio waves, emphasizing the nature of electromagnetic waves. The key findings include the identification of the wavelength as 15m, categorizing it as a short wave, and the calculation of frequency at 2 x 107 Hz. The conversation highlights that while plane waves are theoretically ideal, they are not physically realizable in practice, and real-world waves resemble spherical waves at significant distances from the source. The amplitude is deemed irrelevant for classification, with frequency and wavelength being the primary factors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Knowledge of wave equations and parameters (e.g., wavelength, frequency)
  • Familiarity with the concept of plane and spherical waves
  • Basic principles of energy flux density in electromagnetic waves
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of electromagnetic waves in waveguides
  • Learn about the differences between plane waves and spherical waves
  • Explore the implications of amplitude in wave energy calculations
  • Investigate the practical applications of short wave and VHF/UHF communications
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, telecommunications engineers, and anyone interested in the technical aspects of radio wave propagation and electromagnetic theory.

Lord33
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Flat harmonic electromagnetic wave propagates in the positive direction in vacuo axis y. Vector electromagnetic energy flux density is given by: S(y,t)=Sm *cos(wt-ky)2.Wave value: k=(2*π)/λ=0.41 m-1,Amplitude Sm=26 W/m2.Compare this wave with another wave.

Homework Equations


ƒ=V/λ
k=(2*π)/λ
E=h*ƒ

The Attempt at a Solution


I find wavelength from wave value λ=15m ⇒ it is a radio short wave ⇒next i find frequency from ƒ=V/λ=2*107⇒and finally i find photon energy E=h*ƒ=1,3*10-26 J =81*10-9neV.

I compared the result with the table, and he enters the period of short radio waves, ie, this wave is the same radio signal from your phone or radio?Maybe I made a mistake somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Radio or Mobile phone waves are not flat (I suppose you mean plane waves by the term flat) but they are spherical waves.In order to be more accurate, they are not even spherical waves but they resemble spherical waves when we are far away from the source antenna that produces the waves, they resemble spherical waves in the far field region as we say.

In real world we cannot produce plane(flat) waves cause they would require infinite amount of energy. We can produce spatially restricted plane waves inside waveguides https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waveguide_(electromagnetism).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord33
What about the amplitude, how do I compare with short waves? If ampiluda will be 1026?
 
Lord33 said:
What about the amplitude, how do I compare with short waves? If ampiluda will be 1026?
It doesn't matter what the amplitude is, we look only at the frequency (or equivalently the wave length) if we want to check whether it is a short wave or VHF/UHF wave or a microwave etc. Your calculations seem correct to me.

In my previous post I just wanted to say that plane waves (regardless of their frequency) are not physically realizable, unless of course they are restricted inside waveguides.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord33
Delta² said:
It doesn't matter what the amplitude is, we look only at the frequency (or equivalently the wave length) if we want to check whether it is a short wave or VHF/UHF wave or a microwave etc. Your calculations seem correct to me.

In my previous post I just wanted to say that plane waves (regardless of their frequency) are not physically realizable, unless of course they are restricted inside waveguides.

At any significant distance from the transmitter the radiation is indistinguishable from a plane wave. For example at a 1 m antenna located just 1 km from the transmitter the curvature of the wave over the length of the antenna is 125 microns or less than 1e-8 of the wavelength. Why confuse the issue with this?
 
Cutter Ketch said:
At any significant distance from the transmitter the radiation is indistinguishable from a plane wave. For example at a 1 m antenna located just 1 km from the transmitter the curvature of the wave over the length of the antenna is 125 microns or less than 1e-8 of the wavelength. Why confuse the issue with this?

For two reasons
1) Its good to be accurate even though the difference in real world might be small in the case you display(which it isn't in this case if you take into account point 2) see below)
2) You are "hiding" the fact that in plane waves the amplitude is constant, while in spherical waves the amplitude is inversely proportional from the distance from the source. That's why spherical waves require finite amount of energy, while plane waves require infinite energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K