Comparing Radio Waves: Short Wave vs. Phone/Radio

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around comparing a flat harmonic electromagnetic wave, specifically a short radio wave, with other types of radio waves, such as those used in mobile phones. The original poster presents calculations related to wavelength, frequency, and photon energy, seeking clarification on the nature of these waves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the differences between flat (or plane) waves and spherical waves, questioning the physical realizability of plane waves. The original poster seeks to confirm their calculations and understanding of wave properties, particularly in relation to amplitude and frequency.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying concepts related to wave types and their properties. Some provide insights into the nature of electromagnetic waves and the implications of amplitude versus frequency in identifying wave types. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions made regarding wave characteristics.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the limitations of producing plane waves in practical scenarios, as well as the implications of wave behavior at significant distances from the source. The discussion highlights the need for accuracy in distinguishing between wave types based on their physical properties.

Lord33
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Flat harmonic electromagnetic wave propagates in the positive direction in vacuo axis y. Vector electromagnetic energy flux density is given by: S(y,t)=Sm *cos(wt-ky)2.Wave value: k=(2*π)/λ=0.41 m-1,Amplitude Sm=26 W/m2.Compare this wave with another wave.

Homework Equations


ƒ=V/λ
k=(2*π)/λ
E=h*ƒ

The Attempt at a Solution


I find wavelength from wave value λ=15m ⇒ it is a radio short wave ⇒next i find frequency from ƒ=V/λ=2*107⇒and finally i find photon energy E=h*ƒ=1,3*10-26 J =81*10-9neV.

I compared the result with the table, and he enters the period of short radio waves, ie, this wave is the same radio signal from your phone or radio?Maybe I made a mistake somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Radio or Mobile phone waves are not flat (I suppose you mean plane waves by the term flat) but they are spherical waves.In order to be more accurate, they are not even spherical waves but they resemble spherical waves when we are far away from the source antenna that produces the waves, they resemble spherical waves in the far field region as we say.

In real world we cannot produce plane(flat) waves cause they would require infinite amount of energy. We can produce spatially restricted plane waves inside waveguides https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waveguide_(electromagnetism).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord33
What about the amplitude, how do I compare with short waves? If ampiluda will be 1026?
 
Lord33 said:
What about the amplitude, how do I compare with short waves? If ampiluda will be 1026?
It doesn't matter what the amplitude is, we look only at the frequency (or equivalently the wave length) if we want to check whether it is a short wave or VHF/UHF wave or a microwave etc. Your calculations seem correct to me.

In my previous post I just wanted to say that plane waves (regardless of their frequency) are not physically realizable, unless of course they are restricted inside waveguides.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord33
Delta² said:
It doesn't matter what the amplitude is, we look only at the frequency (or equivalently the wave length) if we want to check whether it is a short wave or VHF/UHF wave or a microwave etc. Your calculations seem correct to me.

In my previous post I just wanted to say that plane waves (regardless of their frequency) are not physically realizable, unless of course they are restricted inside waveguides.

At any significant distance from the transmitter the radiation is indistinguishable from a plane wave. For example at a 1 m antenna located just 1 km from the transmitter the curvature of the wave over the length of the antenna is 125 microns or less than 1e-8 of the wavelength. Why confuse the issue with this?
 
Cutter Ketch said:
At any significant distance from the transmitter the radiation is indistinguishable from a plane wave. For example at a 1 m antenna located just 1 km from the transmitter the curvature of the wave over the length of the antenna is 125 microns or less than 1e-8 of the wavelength. Why confuse the issue with this?

For two reasons
1) Its good to be accurate even though the difference in real world might be small in the case you display(which it isn't in this case if you take into account point 2) see below)
2) You are "hiding" the fact that in plane waves the amplitude is constant, while in spherical waves the amplitude is inversely proportional from the distance from the source. That's why spherical waves require finite amount of energy, while plane waves require infinite energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K