Comparing relativistic momentum to classical

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the percentage error in momentum when using the classical formula p = mu instead of the relativistic formula. The user sets the kinetic energy equal to twice the rest energy and derives the relative velocity u. They initially calculate u using both relativistic and non-relativistic momentum equations but encounter confusion. A suggestion is made to use a Taylor expansion for small values of p/(mc) to simplify the analysis. The importance of using invariant mass in relativistic physics is emphasized, referencing Minkowski's contributions to special relativity.
PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10
EDIT: Okay I don't expect an answer for this because of my crappy attempt at LaTex, i'll work on making it look prettier sorry

Homework Statement


If the kinetic energy of a particle is equal to twice its rest energy, what percentage error is made by using p = mu for the magnitude of its momentum?


Homework Equations


\[E_i=mc^2\]
\[p = \frac{mu}{(1-\frac{u^2}{c^2})^\frac{1}{2}}\]
\[p = mu\]
\[K=\frac{p^2}{2m}\]



The Attempt at a Solution


I set K = 2mc^2 and then solved for the relative velocity u and ended up with u=(2/sqrt(5))*c

I then set K = 2mc^2 again but this time the momentum term was non relativistic, and solving for u I got u = 2c

now I'm lost
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try using your two equations for momentum to get the ratio of the relativistic momentum to the pre-relativistic momentum. If you did the algebra right so far, you should get the right answer.
 
Just perform a Taylor expansion in the quantity p/(mc), which is small for non-relativistic motion. Here m is the invariant (rest) mass of the particle. One should not use any other masses in relativistic physics anymore. That's outdated since 1908 when Minkowski figured out the mathematical structure of special-relativistic space-time!
 
Another equation you might consider using is K=(γ-1)mc2. This would greatly simplify the analysis.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top