Comparing Skewness and Kurtosis Levels: A Question for Data Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
member 428835
hey pf!

i am wondering, if you're looking at two data sets and each set has different skewness levels (i.e. perhaps set 1 has a skewness of .4 and set 2 has a skewness of .5) do we say that these two are relatively un-skewed or highly skewed (or perhaps one of each)?

in other words, how do i compare levels of skewness?

i have the same question for kurtosis, if you could explain?

thanks a ton!

josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You may be trying to get more out of these measurements than they deserve, but that's OK. Here is my two bits. Maybe someone can clarify more:

The skewness of a PDF is definitely influenced by its standard deviation, σ. For this reason, I think that the skew values of two PDFs can only be meaningfully compared if they have identical standard deviations. Of course, any symmetric PDF will have skewness=0. Other than that, I would normalize the skewness number by dividing it by σ3. I would look at some well known unsymmetric distributions like Chi2 and normalize their skewness values to get a feel for the meaning of some values. I have never done this exercise, but maybe someone else can add some insight.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top