Comparing Two Simple Sets: Differentiating with Consistent Logic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Given a set of one element, and a set of two elements each like that of the first, is it possible to differentiate between the two sets using consistant logic to describe both the sets and their differentiation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
{a} = {b, c} if and only if a = b and a = c.


You could talk about a different kind of thing: a multiset, for which [a] and [a,a] are different. (But, [a,b] and [b,a] are the same) But a multiset is generally not a set.

If you further want (a,b) and (b,a) to be different, you want to speak about ordered lists.
 
Hurkyl,

I was surmising that the concept of unity or duality itself is "incompatible" with the actual transformation from unity to duality. Perhaps this idea is too philosophical for the Mathematics forum?
 
*shrug* It all depends on if you can ask your question in a mathematical form. You can't really apply any sort of deductive logic to your question unless you first provide some premises from which one can argue. (e.g. what sort of properties shall we assume "unity" has? And what exactly is a transformation from "unity" to "duality", and which one are you talking about?)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top