Comparison Test Question: How to Determine Convergence of a Complex Integral?

sponsoredwalk
Messages
531
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



I'm just curious as to how to think about the following form of equation.

Homework Equations


\int_{3}^{\infty } \frac{1}{x + e^x} \,dx


The Attempt at a Solution



What you're trying to do is to test it;

\frac{1}{x \ + \ e^x} \ < \ \frac{1}{x}

\frac{1}{x} diverges

\frac{1}{x \ + \ e^x} \ < \ \frac{1}{e^x}

\lim_{t \to \infty} \int_{3}^{t} e^{-x}\,dx \ = \ \lim_{t \to \infty} - e^{-x} | \ _3 ^t \ = \ \lim_{t \to \infty} - {\frac{1}{e^t} \ + \ \frac{1}{e^3}

so this converges to \frac{1}{e^3}.

I don't get how this means the original eq. will also converge?

Both \frac{1}{x} and \frac{1}{e^x} are bigger than the original eq. with one converging and the other diverging.

\frac{1}{x} is bigger than \frac{1}{e^x} but the test of \frac{1}{x^p} is ringing in my ears as a kind of explanation, but I am confused.

Is there an easy way to link all of this together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed, because for [strike]positive x[/strike] x > 1 when p > 1, 1/xp is always less than 1/x. In effect, its graph has less area underneath it for the integration. So there is no contradiction that 1/x leaves just too much area, i.e. it diverges, while 1/xp for p > 1 does not, i.e. it converges. Meanwhile, 1/ex just hugs the x-axis massively more than 1/xp for any constant p, hence it of course converges. Finally, 1/(x+ex) lies even closer to the x-axis and leaves even less area; it converges.

Knowing 1/x diverges does not mean we know 1/(x+ex) diverges or converges. The graph of the latter has less area, but by how much? Enough to stop the integral from diverging? However, knowing that 1/ex converges does tell us that 1/(x+ex) converges, since it has less area than a finite amount.

EDIT: It occurred to me that I also need x > 1, not just x positive. Sorry for the mistake.
 
Last edited:
Ahh Brilliant!

I think that idea of hugging the x-axis makes everything even clearer, thanks a lot for that :wink:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top