Complcated Chemistry Reaction - impossible?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a complex chemistry reaction involving multiple steps, including a 221 reaction that produces either anti-Markovnikov or Markovnikov bromides depending on the reagents used. The second step involves creating an organolithium or Grignard reagent, which is crucial for the subsequent reactions. Participants express confusion about the formation of a Grignard reagent when lithium is used and question discrepancies in carbon counts in the products. Clarifications are sought regarding the mechanics of the Grignard reaction and the transformation of double bonds. The conversation highlights the intricacies of organic chemistry reactions and the importance of understanding each step's implications.
riseofphoenix
Messages
294
Reaction score
2
Complcated Chemistry Reaction - impossible??

2A_zpsa0929c4f.png

2BCD_zps7d3f261c.png


Help :(
My notes say:

Step 1 is a 221 reaction. If peroxides are used in your version, then the anti-Markovnikov bromide is formed. If your version had only HBr, the the Markovnikov bromide is formeed.

Step 2 creates organolithium or Grignard reagent (depending on your version).

Steps 3 is a strong acid (D2O) - strong base (organometallic carbon) reaction which gives a deuterated alkane.

-----

I managed to get A right but I can't get B right :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Why would you think you would get a grignard when you treat with lithium? Why does your answer show four carbons when your starting material is propene?
 


What exactly is the grignard reaction then?
Don't you just remove a C=C bond and make it a single C-C bond and add a another –Br bond to the end of one C atom ??
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top