What is the significance of the factor (2π)^3 in the completeness relation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
I have dug several resources from the internet, but none happen to explain the following formula:

##1 = \int \frac{dp}{(2\pi)^{3}} |\vec{p}><\vec{p}|##

I have done basic quantum mechanics, so I know that this is the completeness relation. Also, I understand that an integral is being taken over all the momentum states. That's all fine by me.

What's tripping me up is the factor of ##(2\pi)^{3}##.

Can someone explain where they come from. I've thinking it has to do with Fourier analysis or something because the same funny factor appears when Fourier transform into momentum space.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed it is related to the Fourier transform. The state ##|p\rangle## is the state normalised such that ##\langle x|p\rangle = e^{-ip\cdot x}##. Using ##\langle x|x'\rangle = \delta(x-x')## and the Fourier transform of the delta function, you will find the correct normalisation of the completeness relation.
 
  • Like
Likes VEReade, vanhees71 and bhobba
So, do you mean that if ##|p\rangle## were the state normalised such that ##\langle x|p\rangle = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2}} e^{ip\cdot x}##, then the correct normalisation of the completeness relation is ##1 = \int d^{3}p |p\rangle \langle p|##?
 
Yes. If you construct the state like that, the completeness relation would not have the factors of 2pi. The states would then be normalised such that ##\langle p|p'\rangle = \delta(p-p')##.
 
Last edited:
The orthonormality condition ##\langle p|p'\rangle = \delta(p-p')## looks more natural than ##\langle p|p'\rangle = 2 \pi \delta(p-p')##.

Don't the factors of ##2 \pi## violate the normalisation condition [the probability adding up to one] when ##p=p'##?
 
That's convention regarding the Fourier transformation. In the high-energy physics community one usually uses the convention
$$\tilde{f}(\omega,\vec{p})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^4} \mathrm{d}^4 x \exp(\mathrm{i} \omega t-\mathrm{i} \vec{p}\cdot \vec{x}),$$
$$f(t,\vec{x})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^4} \mathrm{d}^4 p \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^4} \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t+\mathrm{i} \vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}),$$
i.e., one lumps all ##2 \pi## factors to the momentum measure.
 
failexam said:
The orthonormality condition ##\langle p|p'\rangle = \delta(p-p')## looks more natural than ##\langle p|p'\rangle = 2 \pi \delta(p-p')##.

Don't the factors of ##2 \pi## violate the normalisation condition [the probability adding up to one] when ##p=p'##?

Neither the states ##|p\rangle## nor ##|x\rangle## are normalisable.
 
Thanks!
 
Back
Top