Complex Analysis Singularities and Poles

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of an analytic function with a zero of order 42 at z=0, specifically examining the implications for its derivative and the behavior of related functions such as 1/f and f'/f at that point.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the nature of zeros and singularities, questioning the orders of zeros for f' and the types of singularities for 1/f and f'/f. There is an attempt to connect these concepts to the definitions of holomorphic functions and their forms.

Discussion Status

Some participants have proposed answers regarding the orders of zeros and poles, while others seek clarification on the reasoning behind these answers. There is an ongoing exploration of the definitions and implications of the properties of analytic functions, with some guidance provided on how to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are encouraged to revisit definitions and theorems related to holomorphic functions and their zeros, indicating a need for a deeper understanding of the concepts involved in the problem.

bballife1508
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Assume throughout that f is analytic, with a zero of order 42 at z=0.

(a)What kind of zero does f' have at z=0? Why?

(b)What kind of singularity does 1/f have at z=0? Why?

(c)What kind of singularity does f'/f have at z=0? Why?



for (a) I'm pretty sure it is a zero of order 41

for (b) I'm almost sure it is a pole of order 42

but for (c) I am not quite sure nor can I really explain any of a-c

PLEASE HELP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you arrived at a plausible answer, you must have some intuition for this. Explain it, and go back to the definitions if you need to. You must have some idea about the form of a holomorphic function with a zero of order 42.
 
are my answers correct and how can i do (c)?
 
Okay, if some analytic function f has a zero of order n at z = a, then you can certainly write it as f(z) = (z-a)^n * h(z) where h is holomorphic, right? This much should at least be true even if all you had was a sensible notion of a zero of a function. So go from here to explain a)-c). It is NOT hard to work out the details.
 
is it sufficient to say that

f(z)=z^42*h(z) which implies that f'(z)=42z^41*g(z)

so f'/f has an extra z on the bottom so there is a pole of order 1?
 
Looks good, though you don't really need the g.
 
what do you mean i don't need the g? i can't use h still correct?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K