Complex anaylsis question involving liouville's theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter harmonie_Best
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Theorem
harmonie_Best
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that if f is an entire function which satisfies (a) I am f(z) > - 10 or (b) |f(z)| >= 5, then f is constant.


Homework Equations


liouville's theorem, Cauchy's inequality(?)


The Attempt at a Solution



Want to show that both are bounded as it will satisfy liouville's theorem and prove they are constant,

So there exists an M \in R s.t. |f(z)| <= M, for all z \in f(z)

Just get really confused now, can't see how to get it so that the sign is the other way round. Do you take the negative of both to change direction of the sign =/

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Taking the negative won't change the sign of the inequality. It's an absolute value. Set g(z)=1/f(z) and see what Liouville tells you about g(z).
 
Okay so can I say:

Set g(z) = 1/f(z) which is <= 1/5, therefore g(z) is bounded by 1/5, and by Cauchys integral theorem, g(z) is constant. As g(z) a function including f(z) we can conclude that f(z) is also constant?
 
harmonie_ post: 3171132 said:
Okay so can I say:

Set g(z) = 1/f(z) which is <= 1/5, therefore g(z) is bounded by 1/5, and by Cauchys integral theorem, g(z) is constant. As g(z) a function including f(z) we can conclude that f(z) is also constant?

You are leaving the absolute values out. |g(z)|<=1/5, right. So it's constant. And it's by Liouville's theorem, not Cauchy's. If g(x) is constant then since f(z)=1/g(z), f(z) must be constant.
 
Last edited:
Ohhhh, I get it, thank you =) I need to pay more attention!x
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top