Complex Contour Integral Problem, meaning

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the geometry of complex line integrals, particularly in relation to the area they represent. It compares complex line integrals to real line integrals, emphasizing that while the latter can be visualized as the area under a curve, complex integrals can be interpreted similarly through their path. The integral around the path BDEFG is equated to the area from 0 to 2π, illustrating how complex functions can be viewed as 2-D vectors. The conversation highlights that the line integral of a 2-D vector field relates to the real part of the complex function's integral. Overall, the insights aim to clarify the geometric interpretation of complex integrals in analysis.
Amad27
Messages
409
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



First, let's take a look at the complex line integral.

What is the geometry of the complex line integral?

If we look at the real line integral GIF:

[2]: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Line_integral_of_scalar_field.gif

The real line integral is a path, but then you make a 3d figure, and it is the area under the 3d shape.

What about for complex integral?

And

In the problem from Schaum's Outline:

[1]: http://i.stack.imgur.com/U65As.png

This is an interesting complex analysis problem; **The figure on the bottom left is what is being referred to,Fig7-10.**

How is in the solution:

$$\int_{BDEFG} = \int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{(Re^{i\theta})^{p-1}iRe^{i\theta} d\theta}{1 + Re^{i\theta}}$$

How is the integral around the $$BDEFG$$, the same as the area from$$ 0 \to 2\pi$$

Thanks.

Homework Equations



Above

The Attempt at a Solution



$$\int_{BDEFG} = \int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{(Re^{i\theta})^{p-1}iRe^{i\theta} d\theta}{1 + Re^{i\theta}}$$

How is the integral around the $BDEFG$, the same as the area from 0 to $2\pi$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can interpret the line integral of ##f(x,y) \geq 0## as an area. If ##f(x,y) \geq 0##, then ##\oint_C f(x,y) \space dr## is the area of one side of the "curtain" whose base is ##C## and whose height above any ##(x,y)## is ##f(x,y)##. Integrating along the whole path would give you the area of the curtain.

In the case where ##C## is located between two points on an axis, such as the line segment that joins ##(a,0)## to ##(b,0)##, then the line integral is actually just a regular single integral:

$$\int_C f(x,y) \space dr = \int_a^b f(x,0) \space dx$$

Which is simply the area under the function. A similar case is observed for ##C := (0, c) \rightarrow (0, d)##:

$$\int_C f(x,y) \space dr = \int_c^d f(0,y) \space dy$$

Complex numbers are really 2-D vectors, and so they are analogous to 2-D vector fields. The line integral of a 2-D vector field corresponds to the real part of the line integral of the conjugate of the complex function.

Usually the most intuitive way to view this is to think about the work done by a force field in moving a particle along a curve from one point to another.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K