Complex Exponents: QM Basics & Physical Importance

[daniel_i_l]

I just started learning QM and have a question - let's say that i have the following amplitude for a particle:
a*e^(-i*frequency*t)
since the exponent doesn't change the probability, what is it's physical importance? from what i understood the frequency coorsponds to the energy - since energy is the tendency of the particle to stay in it's current state, a higher frequency would make the particle have more influence in the case of interference with another particle. so basically the exponent only has significance when it interacts with another particle?

And one more thing, does the amplitude of the state change with time only when it's multiplied by a real exponent?
Thanks.

 

[Crosson]

The state you describe is called a stationary state, or alternatively a pure state of, or even better an eigen state of, the Hamiltonian operator.

Given an arbitrary wave function, it is not likely to be an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian for the configuration. But the eigenstates do form a basis in which we can express our arbitrary wave function as a linear combination of eigenstates of various (complex exponent) frequencies.

Then the short answer is, the complex exponent is of critical importance when we have a mixed state, the normalized sum of two or more terms that you described above but having different frequencies.

 

[Ratzinger]

I just started learning QM and have a question - let's say that i have the following amplitude for a particle:
a*e^(-i*frequency*t)

The term you cite is normally appended on the stationary wave function term that we get from a time independent Schrödinger equ. From this eq. the allowed frequencies are determined and the (normalized) wave functions of it give the physical information.

 

[CarlB]

I just started learning QM and have a question - let's say that i have the following amplitude for a particle:
a*e^(-i*frequency*t) since the exponent doesn't change the probability, what is it's physical importance?

It's to define the momentum of the particle if that measurement were to be made.

I'm sure they covered the "Heisenburg uncertainty principle". It's a restriction on how small you can make the product of the uncertainty in position and momentum. The absolute value of the wave function defines the probability distribution for a position measurement, but it says nothing about the momentum probability distribution.

When you calculate the momentum probability distribution you will find that the imaginary stuff becomes important.

 

[jtbell]

Consider a specific example which you'll probably encounter soon if you haven't already, the one-dimensional "particle in a box," in which the particle is completely confined to a region 0 \le x \le L. The energy eigenstate with lowest energy is described by

\Psi_1 (x,t) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} \sin \left( {\frac{\pi x}{L}} \right) e^{-i E_1 t / \hbar}

where E_1 = \pi^2 \hbar^2 / 2mL^2.

The energy eigenstate with second lowest energy is

\Psi_2 (x,t) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{L}} \sin \left( {\frac{2 \pi x}{L}} \right) e^{-i E_2 t / \hbar}

where E_2 = 4 \pi^2 \hbar^2 / 2mL^2.

If the particle is in either one of these states, then the probability distribution \Psi^* \Psi doesn't change with time. If the particle is in a superposition of these states, for example

\Psi(x,t) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \Psi_1(x,t) + \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \Psi_2(x,t)

in which it has equal probability of having either energy, then the probability distribution \Psi^* \Psi does change with time. It oscillates or "sloshes" back and forth inside the box, with frequency \omega = (E_2 - E_1) / \hbar.

So as far as the probability distribution is concerned, the complex exponential comes into play physically when two energy eigenstates interfere with each other.