Complex impendance in RL circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on demonstrating that the impedance of a parallel RL circuit is equivalent to that of a non-parallel RL circuit, while maintaining constant inductance but allowing resistance to vary. Users seek guidance on expressing the impedance mathematically, specifically requesting formulas for both series and parallel configurations. The conversation highlights the necessity of complex algebra to derive these expressions. A reference link to HyperPhysics is provided for additional context. Understanding the relationship between resistance and inductance in different circuit configurations is crucial for solving the problem.
shakaflaka
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have to show that the impendance of a parallel RL circuit would be the same in measure as the impendance of a non-parallel RL circuit (sry, don't know how to express this in English). I have to show this so that the inductivity stays the same in both cases but the resistance can be changed. I'm not very good with complex algebra, so does anyone have an idea how can I do it? Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you write two expressions, one each for the impedance of the series and parallel circuits where the resistances are Rs and Rp respectively? I'm afraid that you won't be able to avoid doing some complex algebra.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Back
Top