Complex Integral Residue Theorem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the application of the Complex Integral Residue Theorem, specifically addressing a mistake in calculating the residue at a simple pole. The user incorrectly assumed that the expression (f(t) - w) would cancel out, similar to simpler cases. The correct limit expression for the residue should be (t - z) * t * f'(t) / (f(t) - w), highlighting the importance of accurately identifying terms in residue calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis concepts, specifically the Residue Theorem.
  • Familiarity with limits and derivatives in complex functions.
  • Knowledge of simple poles and their properties in complex functions.
  • Experience with mathematical notation and expressions used in complex integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of the Residue Theorem in complex analysis.
  • Study the properties of simple poles and their residues.
  • Practice calculating residues for various complex functions.
  • Explore advanced topics in complex analysis, such as contour integration.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying complex analysis, as well as anyone involved in solving complex integrals and residues.

Tangent87
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
I have attached a pdf of my problem and attempted solution. I seem to be a factor of f'(z) out from the required solution, can anyone see where I've gone wrong?
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, shouldn't the expression you are taking the limit of to get the residue be (t-z)*t*f'(t)/(f(t)-w)?
 
Ahh yeah crap, I was thinking f(t)-w would cancel as usual when taking a residue of a simple pole but it's f(t) not t. Cheers.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K