How to Build Complex Laplace Operator from First Principles

  • Thread starter Thread starter topcomer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Laplacian
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of constructing a Complex Laplace Operator from first principles, specifically using the framework of differential geometry. The original poster expresses uncertainty about where to begin, particularly in applying the exterior derivative to complex-valued functions. They note that while the canonical Laplace operator can be derived from the gradient operator, the application to complex functions remains unclear. Participants suggest considering the standard definitions of derivatives with respect to a complex variable and its conjugate, and exploring the gradient of the divergence of the real and imaginary parts. The conversation highlights a need for clarity on how to effectively build the desired operator in this context.
topcomer
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Has anyone ever heard about a Complex Laplace Operator? I would like to build one from first principles as in differential geometry ∆=d*d, where d is the exterior derivative, but I don't know where to start. Actually, I was even unsure in which forum to post the question.

If one defines d to be the gradient operator acting on continuous or discrete functions, then one gets the canonical Laplace operator or the Laplace matrix used in graph theory and image processing. But what if one consider complex-valued functions?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Has this been done? For complex function w(z) = f(x) + i.g(y), z = x + i.y... I don't see how to get a Laplace operator from it! Would be interested to know how it is done though, so I think I'll subscribe (and bump).
 
MikeyW said:
Has this been done? For complex function w(z) = f(x) + i.g(y), z = x + i.y... I don't see how to get a Laplace operator from it! Would be interested to know how it is done though, so I think I'll subscribe (and bump).

I have no idea, for complex functions there is a standard definition of taking the derivative w.r.t. z and its conjugate, but I don't see how to use this to construct the Hodge Laplacian I'm interested in.
 
I guess you could take the gradient of the divergence of real and imaginary parts of the function on the complex plane?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top