Complex numbers and beyond....

Bruno Tolentino
Messages
96
Reaction score
0
If the solution of the quadratic equation \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a} produces a new kind of number, the complex numbers a \pm i b so, the solution the cubic equation should to produce a new kind of number too, and the solution of the quartic equation too, etc...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Bruno Tolentino said:
If the solution of the quadratic equation \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a} produces a new kind of number, the complex numbers a \pm i b so, the solution the cubic equation should to produce a new kind of number too, and the solution of the quartic equation too, etc...
Why? Your hypothesis is speculative.
 
I totally agree. By the fundamental theorem of algebra an equation
P_n(z)=a_0+a_1z+\ldots+a_nz^n=0
has at least a solution in the complex field \mathbb{C}
z_1=a+bi
So the LHS of the equation above can be written as
(z-z_1)P_{n-1}(z)=0
we can repeat the previous step up to n times getting n roots z_1,\;z_2,\;,\;\ldots,\;z_n such that
(z-z_1)(z-z_2)\ldots(z-z_n)=0

Thus the equation of degree n has up to n complex roots. They are not necessarily all distinct. Some of them can be multiple as in the following example
x^4(x-1)^3(x-2)^5=0
has the solutions
x=0,\;4ple,\;x=1,\;3ple,\;x=2,\;5ple
 
Bruno Tolentino said:
If the solution of the quadratic equation \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a} produces a new kind of number, the complex numbers a \pm i b so, the solution the cubic equation should to produce a new kind of number too, and the solution of the quartic equation too, etc...

And that's the beauty of the complex numbers! That you don't need any new kind of number for solving higher order equations! This point of view is made very clear in the Feynman lectures on complex numbers. Because naively, you do indeed expect that for solving new kind of equations, you will need new kind of numbers. But the entire mystery and beauty of complex numbers is that they are enough to solve all polynomial equations. This turns out to be very very difficult to prove though, it is called "the fundamental theorem of algebra" and you'll need some analysis to show this.
 
  • Like
Likes aikismos
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top